Pages

Showing posts with label Finance project. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Finance project. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 01, 2011

Project Report Mutual Funds

Mutual Fund – Awareness Among Peoples

Liberalization and globalization, along with the expanded distribution of the wealth among the middle class has evoked an interest of the common man into the intricacies of capital market.
Capital Market, once perceived to be a market of only for the elite and speculators, but now also attracted the attention of the common man. The stockbrokers were always influential and affluent, but a lot of transformation has taken place in his image from pawnbrokers to a man of financial acumen. The common man has now started learning the vocabulary of the capital market with terms like “bull and bear” explored upon in newest dimensions.
But the turbulence of the stock market has made the common investor apprehensive that is why the common investor has remained away from the industrial securities markets.
Mutual Funds Act as a financial intermediary between the common investors and the capital market. While on one hand they ensures a smooth returns on the investment of the investor and on the other hand they give them a much-desired security.
This project is all about the mutual funds awareness, what is the current market position of mutual funds & more or less about the industry growth in future.
This project is about the no. of interesting facts such as “a very low awareness level regarding Mutual fund amongst the people” and so on. This project helped me to know the differ facts as mutual funds industry is highly competitive & no. of schemes launched by differ players of the industry. Differ schemes have differ advantages for investors as some of the schemes are tax saving, some provides capital gain & some covers the future span of the investors.
It was interesting to know the capital market has been growing over the years in India. I feel that same growth will continue in long run with the higher rate.

Objectives of the Project - Mutual Funds

The main objective of this project report is to know about different mutual funds and the market position of different mutual funds.
  • To find the awareness among the investor about the Mutual Fund.
  • To find out the market position of differ mutual funds.
  • To study the scope of mutual funds industry in the future.
Usefulness of the Study
This study provides Future of Mutual Funds industry information as well as awareness level amongst people for Mutual Funds.
The first part of the study gives an outlook to management as to how the mutual funds are performing in the current market situation as a result what may be the future of this industry.
Other two parts suggest the management that how many persons are aware of the mutual funds & what type of mutual funds & other investment channel they prefer in current Mkt. situation.
This study also is very informative the students who want to understand and undertake assignments in the industry. This study also facilitates the general people who can understand the importance and explore the new option for investment

Project Description :
Title : Project Report on Mutual Funds
Category : Project Report for MBA
Description : Project Report on Mutual Funds, Mutual Fund Awareness Among Peoples, Mutual Funds Industry, Market Position of differ Mutual Funds, Scope of Mutual Funds Industry in Future
Pages : 75
This project is our paid category, its cost is Rs. 500/- only. If you need this project, mail us at this id : vuaccess@gmail.com

We will send you a hardcopy with hard binding and a softcopy in CD from courier.

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

MBA Project New Report

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


1

Chapter 1 - Introduction
Indian Pharmaceutical Industry

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Indian Pharmaceutical Industry today is in the front rank of India’s science-based industries with wide ranging capabilities in the complex field of drug manufacture and technology. A highly organized sector, the Indian Pharma Industry is estimated to be worth $ 4.5 billion, growing at about 8 to 9 percent annually. It ranks very high in the third world, in terms of technology, quality and range of medicines manufactured. From simple headache pills to sophisticated antibiotics and complex cardiac compounds, almost every type of medicine is now made indigenously.

Playing a key role in promoting and sustaining development in the vital field of medicines, Indian Pharma Industry boasts of quality producers and many units approved by regulatory authorities in USA and UK. International companies associated with this sector have stimulated, assisted and spearheaded this dynamic development in the past 53 years and helped to put India on the pharmaceutical map of the world.

The pharmaceutical industry in India meets around 70% of the country's demand for bulk drugs, drug intermediates, pharmaceutical formulations, chemicals, tablets, capsules, orals and injectibles. There are about 250 large units and about 8000 Small Scale Units, which form the core of the pharmaceutical industry in India (including 5 Central Public Sector Units). These units produce the complete range of pharmaceutical formulations, i.e., medicines ready for consumption by patients and about 350 bulk drugs, i.e., chemicals having therapeutic value and used for production of pharmaceutical formulations.

2

ADVANTAGE INDIA 1. Competent workforce: India has a pool of personnel with high managerial and technical competence as also skilled workforce. It has an educated work force and English is commonly used. Professional services are easily available. 2. Cost-effective chemical synthesis: Its track record of development, particularly in the area of improved cost-beneficial chemical synthesis for various drug molecules is excellent. It provides a wide variety of bulk drugs and exports sophisticated bulk drugs. 3. Legal & Financial Framework: India has a 53 year old democracyand hence has a solid legal framework and strong financial markets. There is already an established international industry and business community. 4. Information & Technology: It has a good network of world-class educational institutions and established strengths in Information Technology. 5. Globalizations: The country is committed to a free market economy and globalization. Above all, it has a 70 million middle class market, which is continuously growing. 6. Consolidation: For the first time in many years, the international pharmaceutical industry is finding great opportunities in India. The process of consolidation, which has become a generalized phenomenon in the world pharmaceutical industry, has started taking place in India.

3 SWOT Analysis

Strengths • Cost Competitiveness • Well Developed Industry with Strong Manufacturing Base • Access to pool of highly trained scientists, both in India and abroad. • Strong marketing and distribution network • Rich Biodiversity • Competencies in Chemistry and process development. Weaknesses • Low investments in innovative R&D and lack of resources to compete with MNCs for New Drug Discovery Research and to commercialize molecules on a worldwide basis. • Lack of strong linkages between industry and academia. • Low medical expenditure and healthcare spend in the country • Production of spurious and low quality drugs tarnishes the image of industry at home and abroad. • Shortage of medicines containing psychotropic substances. There are 4000 such brands of medicines that fall under the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985.Under a clause of this Act, the retailer has to sign the consignment note provided by the stockist. The police check this note regularly to prevent these medicines getting diverted to the drug mafia and they can arrest the retailer if the signatures are under suspect. To protest against this clause, the retailers have stopped stocking these medicines, some of which is life saving.

4 Opportunities • Significant export potential. • Licensing deals with MNCs for NCEs and NDDS. • Marketing alliances to sell MNC products in domestic market. • Contract manufacturing arrangements with MNCs • Potential for developing India as a centre for international clinical trials • Niche player in global pharmaceutical R&D. • Supply of generic drugs to developed markets. Threats • Product patent regime poses serious challenge to domestic industry unless it invests in research and development • R&D efforts of Indian pharmaceutical companies hampered by lack of enabling regulatory requirement. For instance, restrictions on animal testing outdated patent office. • Drug Price Control Order puts unrealistic ceilings on product prices and profitability and prevents pharmaceutical companies from generating investible surplus. • Lowering of tariff protection • The new MRP based excise duty regime threatens the existence of many small scale pharma units, especially in the states of Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra, that were involved in contract manufacturing for the larger, established players. These companies are now shifting their manufacturing from these states to states like J&K that enjoy tax holidays.

5 Identified Problem

The economy worldwide is facing severe recession and the current recession is very severe and prolonged one after second world war. The share market all along the world is down to a significant level compared to the levels it was before the current world wide recession. There is pressure on all the industry due to liquidity crunch. The stock prices are reduced to an extent more than 50% over past 12 months. Raising capital required for the business expansion has almost stopped with share market crash. The working capital required for the operations dried up as banks are not willing to lend as the banks are risk awesome and future of the economy is blink.

Need For Study The capital market returns are negative since Jan 2008. The market capitalization of several firms are beaten down to as much as more than 50%. There is continued down trend in the market and returns are uncertain and investment in the capital market are at greater risk which was never seen post word war II. There is need for investors to asses the risk associated with there investments under current market scenario, and to decide on continued investing and to take fresh investment decisions or reallocate there current portfolio. Objectives and Scope

The objectives of the present studies are to find out past performance of top Indian pharmaceutical companies. To identify and group them in to stable and performers and under performers. The objective assessment is carried out through ratio analysis for the period of 2004 to 2008. Deliverables Identifying performers and under performers among the top Indian pharmaceutical companies and classifying them for investment decisions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

6

Chapter 2 – Literature Survey

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A ratio: Is the mathematical relationship between two quantities in the form of a fraction or percentage.

Ratio analysis: is essentially concerned with the calculation of relationships which after proper identification and interpretation may provide information about the operations and state of affairs of a business enterprise. The analysis is used to provide indicators of past performance in terms of critical success factors of a business. This assistance in decision-making reduces reliance on guesswork and intuition and establishes a basis for sound judgement. Types of Ratios A: Liquidity Ratios


Liquidity refers to the ability of a firm to meet its short-term financial obligations when and as they fall due.



The main concern of liquidity ratio is to measure the ability of the firms to meet their short-term maturing obligations. Failure to do this will result in the total failure of the business, as it would be forced into liquidation.

7 Current Ratio The Current Ratio expresses the relationship between the firm’s current assets and its current liabilities. Current assets normally includes cash, marketable securities, accounts receivable and inventories. Current liabilities consist of accounts payable, short term notes payable, short-term loans, current maturities of long term debt, accrued income taxes and other accrued expenses (wages).

The rule of thumb says that the current ratio should be at least 2, that is the current assets should meet current liabilities at least twice. Quick Ratio Measures assets that are quickly converted into cash and they are compared with current liabilities. This ratio realizes that some of current assets are not easily convertible to cash e.g. inventories. The quick ratio, also referred to as acid test ratio, examines the ability of the business to cover its short-term obligations from its “quick” assets only (i.e. it ignores stock). The quick ratio is calculated as follows Clearly this ratio will be lower than the current ratio, but the difference between the two (the gap) will indicate the extent to which current assets consist of stock. B: Asset Management/Activity Ratios If a business does not use its assets effectively, investors in the business would rather take their money and place it somewhere else. In order for the assets to be used effectively, the business needs a high turnover.

8 Unless the business continues to generate high turnover, assets will be idle as it is impossible to buy and sell fixed assets continuously as turnover changes. Activity ratios are therefore used to assess how active various assets are in the business. Average Collection Period The average collection period measures the quality of debtors since it indicates the speed of their collection.


The shorter the average collection period, the better the quality of debtors, as a short collection period implies the prompt payment by debtors.



The average collection period should be compared against the firm’s credit terms and policy to judge its credit and collection efficiency.



An excessively long collection period implies a very liberal and inefficient credit and collection performance.

The delay in collection of cash impairs the firm’s liquidity. On the other hand, too low a collection period is not necessarily favourable, rather it may indicate a very restrictive credit and collection policy which may curtail sales and hence adversely affect profit.

Inventory Turnover This ratio measures the stock in relation to turnover in order to determine how often the stock turns over in the business. It indicates the efficiency of the firm in selling its product. It is calculated by dividing he cost of goods sold by the average inventory.

9 Total Assets Turnover Asset turnover is the relationship between sales and assets
• •

The firm should manage its assets efficiently to maximise sales. The total asset turnover indicates the efficiency with which the firm uses all its assets to generate sales.



It is calculated by dividing the firm’s sales by its total assets.



Generally, the higher the firm’s total asset turnover, the more efficiently its assets have been utilised.

Fixed Asset Turnover The fixed assets turnover ratio measures the efficiency with which the firm has been using its fixed assets to generate sales. It is calculated by dividing the firm’s sales by its net fixed assets as follows:



Generally, high fixed assets turnovers are preferred since they indicate a better efficiency in fixed assets utilisation.

C: Financial Leverage (Gearing) Ratios


The ratios indicate the degree to which the activities of a firm are supported by creditors’ funds as opposed to owners.

10


The relationship of owner’s equity to borrowed funds is an important indicator of financial strength.



The debt requires fixed interest payments and repayment of the loan and legal action can be taken if any amounts due are not paid at the appointed time. A relatively high proportion of funds contributed by the owners indicates a cushion (surplus) which shields creditors against possible losses from default in payment. The greater the proportion of equity funds, the greater the degree of financial strength. Financial leverage will be to the advantage of the ordinary shareholders as long as the rate of earnings on capital employed is greater than the rate payable on borrowed funds. The following ratios can be used to identify the financial strength and risk of the business.

Equity Ratio The equity ratio is calculated as follows:



A high equity ratio reflects a strong financial structure of the company. A relatively low equity ratio reflects a more speculative situation because of the effect of high leverage and the greater possibility of financial difficulty arising from excessive debt burden.

Debt Ratio This is the measure of financial strength that reflects the proportion of capital which has been funded by debt, including preference shares. This ratio is calculated as follows:

11 With higher debt ratio (low equity ratio), a very small cushion has developed thus not giving creditors the security they require. The company would therefore find it relatively difficult to raise additional financial support from external sources if it wished to take that route. The higher the debt ratio the more difficult it becomes for the firm to raise debt. Debt to Equity ratio This ratio indicates the extent to which debt is covered by shareholders’ funds. It reflects the relative position of the equity holders and the lenders and indicates the company’s policy on the mix of capital funds. The debt to equity ratio is calculated as follows:

Times Interest Earned Ratio This ratio measure the extent to which earnings can decline without causing financial losses to the firm and creating an inability to meet the interest cost.


The times interest earned shows how many times the business can pay its interest bills from profit earned.



Present and prospective loan creditors such as bondholders, are vitally interested to know how adequate the interest payments on their loans are covered by the earnings available for such payments.



Owners, managers and directors are also interested in the ability of the business to service the fixed interest charges on outstanding debt.

The ratio is calculated as follows:

12 D: Profitability Ratios Profitability is the ability of a business to earn profit over a period of time. Without profit, there is no cash and therefore profitability must be seen as a critical success factors.
• •

A company should earn profits to survive and grow over a long period of time. Profits are essential, but it would be wrong to assume that every action initiated by management of a company should be aimed at maximizing profits, irrespective of social consequences.

Profitability is a result of a larger number of policies and decisions. The profitability ratios show the combined effects of liquidity, asset management (activity) and debt management (gearing) on operating results. The overall measure of success of a business is the profitability which results from the effective use of its resources. Gross Profit Margin
• •

Normally the gross profit has to rise proportionately with sales. It can also be useful to compare the gross profit margin across similar businesses although there will often be good reasons for any disparity.

Net Profit Margin This is a widely used measure of performance and is comparable across companies in similar industries. The fact that a business works on a very low margin need not cause alarm because there are some sectors in the industry that work on a basis of high turnover and low margins, for examples supermarkets and motorcar dealers. What is more important in any trend is the margin and whether it compares well with similar businesses.

13

Return on Investment (ROI) Income is earned by using the assets of a business productively. The more efficient the production, the more profitable the business. The rate of return on total assets indicates the degree of efficiency with which management has used the assets of the enterprise during an accounting period. This is an important ratio for all readers of financial statements. Investors have placed funds with the managers of the business. The managers used the funds to purchase assets which will be used to generate returns. If the return is not better than the investors can achieve elsewhere, they will instruct the managers to sell the assets and they will invest elsewhere. The managers lose their jobs and the business liquidates.

Return on Equity (ROE) This ratio shows the profit attributable to the amount invested by the owners of the business. It also shows potential investors into the business what they might hope to receive as a return. The stockholders’ equity includes share capital, share premium, distributable and non-distributable reserves. The ratio is calculated as follows:

Earning Per Share (EPS) Whatever income remains in the business after all prior claims, other than owners claims (i.e. ordinary dividends) have been paid, will belong to the ordinary shareholders who can then make a decision as to how much of this income they wish to remove from the business in the form of a dividend, and how much they wish to retain in the business. The shareholders are particularly

14 interested in knowing how much has been earned during the financial year on each of the shares held by them. For this reason, an earning per share figure must be calculated. Clearly then, the earning per share calculation will be:

E: Market Value Ratios These ratios indicate the relationship of the firm’s share price to dividends and earnings. Note that when we refer to the share price, we are talking about the Market value and not the Nominal value as indicated by the par value. For this reason, it is difficult to perform these ratios on unlisted companies as the market price for their shares is not freely available. One would first have to value the shares of the business before calculating the ratios. Market value ratios are strong indicators of what investors think of the firm’s past performance and future prospects. Dividend Yield Ratio The dividend yield ratio indicates the return that investors are obtaining on their investment in the form of dividends. This yield is usually fairly low as the investors are also receiving capital growth on their investment in the form of an increased share price. It is interesting to note that there is strong correlation between dividend yields and market prices. Invariably, the higher the dividend, the higher the market value of the share. The dividend yield ratio compares the dividend per share against the price of the share and is calculated as:

15 Notice a healthy increase in the yield from 2000 to 2002. The main reason for this is that the dividend per share increased while at the same time, the price of a share dropped. This is fairly unusual because share prices usually increase when dividends increase. However there could be number of reasons why this has happened, either due to the economy or to mismanagement, leading to a loss of faith in the stock market or in this particular stock. Normally a very high dividend yield signals potential financial difficulties and possible dividend payout cut. The dividend per share is merely the total dividend divided by the number of shares issued. The price per share is the market price of the share at the end of the financial year. Price/Earning Ratio (P/E ratio)


P/E ratio is a useful indicator of what premium or discount investors are prepared to pay or receive for the investment.



The higher the price in relation to earnings, the higher the P/E ratio which indicates the higher the premium an investor is prepared to pay for the share. This occurs because the investor is extremely confident of the potential growth and earnings of the share.

The price-earning ratio is calculated as follows:

1. High P/E generally reflects lower risk and/or higher growth prospects for earnings. 2. The above ratio shows that the shares were traded at a much higher premium in 2000 than were in 2002. In 2000 the price was 26.8 times higher than earnings while in 2002, the price was only 12 times higher. Dividend Cover

16


This ratio measures the extent of earnings that are being paid out in the form of dividends, i.e. how many times the dividends paid are covered by earnings (similar to times interest earned ratio discussed above).



A higher cover would indicate that a larger percentage of earnings are being retained and reinvested in the business while a lower dividend cover would indicate the converse.

Dividend pay-out ratio This ratio looks at the dividend payment in relation to net income and can be calculated as follows:

Note: Even though the dividend yield has increased, the dividend payout ratio has reduced, showing that a lower proportion of earnings were paid out as dividend. The ratio has only reduced slightly, however, from 50.7% in 2000 to 49.4% in 2002. Generally, the low growth companies have higher dividends payouts and high growth companies have lower dividend payouts.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

17

Chapter 3 – Methodology

Type of Project: The current study is of descriptive and would have secondary data collection from various sources especially from the annual reports of top Indian pharmaceutical companies. Tools for data analysis: Computation of various finical ratios such as profitability, liquidity, efficiency, gearing, investment using standers known formulas and techniques and plotting the rations to find the spread among the companies studied to identify those who have ratios which are well with in acceptable range for better performance and those who would require improvements in the ratios.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

18

Chapter 4 – Data Analysis and Interpretations

LIQUIDITY RATIO: Liquidity refers to the ability of a firm to meet its short-term financial obligations when and as they fall due. The main concern of liquidity ratio is to measure the ability of the firms to meet their shortterm maturing obligations. Failure to do this will result in the total failure of the business, as it would be forced into liquidation. Financial Ratio Current Ratio Formula Measurements A measure of short-term liquidity. Current Assets / Current Indicates the ability of entity to liabilities meet its short-term debts from its current assets A more rigorous measure of shortCurrent Assets less inventory / term liquidity. Indicates the ability Current liabilities of the entity to meet unexpected demands from liquid current asses

Quick Ratio

19 Table 1 : Current ratio analysis Company Name Sun Pharma Cipla GSK DRL Ranbaxy Divis Lupin Piramal Glenmark Cadila Biocon Avantis Pfizer Matrix Aztra Torrent Wyetn Aurobindo Novatis Wockhardt Dishman IPCA FDC Abbot Merck 2004 1.12 1.44 1.03 1.84 0.97 2.20 1.19 1.19 2.11 1.04 1.37 1.10 1.14 1.30 1.63 1.07 1.52 3.22 1.18 1.06 1.90 2.27 1.47 0.51 1.15 Current Ratio 2005 2006 2007 1.38 1.34 1.92 1.55 1.87 1.96 0.75 0.60 0.57 1.20 1.31 1.35 1.11 1.24 1.28 2.33 1.84 2.48 1.33 1.41 1.69 1.11 1.06 1.33 3.43 2.64 2.42 0.50 0.61 0.56 0.98 1.25 1.68 1.65 1.32 0.92 0.88 0.87 0.85 0.96 1.05 1.16 0.70 1.21 0.85 1.14 1.31 1.60 0.68 1.05 0.65 2.74 2.53 2.74 0.96 0.79 1.25 0.80 1.04 1.13 2.70 2.54 1.70 2.38 1.95 1.59 1.56 1.66 1.82 0.79 0.97 1.36 1.13 1.11 0.76

2008 1.32 1.86 0.45 1.16 1.06 2.13 1.88 1.13 2.29 0.74 0.74 1.17 0.78 1.26 0.94 1.19 0.57 2.70 0.83 1.39 2.15 1.69 1.12 1.26 1.04

Current Ratio 2004 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Current Ratio 2005

Current Ratio 2006

Current Ratio 2007

Current Ratio 2008

Su

Ph ar m a Ci pl a G SK D Ra RL nb ax y D iv is Lu pi Pi n r G ama len l m ar Ca k di Bi l a oc A on va nt is Pf iz e M r at rix A zt To ra rre n W t A ye ur tn ob in N do W ova oc tis kh a D r dt ish m a IP n CA FD C A bb o M t er ck

n

20 2004 0.51 0.67 0.40 1.22 0.40 0.99 0.60 0.59 1.32 0.56 0.80 0.54 0.52 0.56 0.60 0.37 0.63 2.10 0.71 0.65 0.87 1.11 0.71 0.27 0.65 2005 0.77 0.69 0.29 0.72 0.53 1.00 0.67 0.39 2.48 0.18 0.69 0.86 0.46 0.43 0.34 0.37 0.28 1.60 0.40 0.49 1.35 1.15 0.79 0.31 0.65 Quick Ratio 2006 0.68 0.92 0.21 0.76 0.60 0.69 0.76 0.49 1.78 0.28 0.83 0.59 0.44 0.54 0.72 0.56 0.65 1.55 0.33 0.58 1.23 0.86 0.59 0.39 0.64 2007 0.98 1.03 0.15 0.96 0.65 1.12 0.94 0.70 1.60 0.24 1.09 0.32 0.39 0.60 0.52 0.78 0.28 1.48 0.50 0.62 0.94 0.71 0.54 0.48 0.34 2008 0.97 1.05 0.13 0.70 0.55 0.96 0.95 0.63 1.58 0.34 0.34 0.36 0.36 0.55 0.66 0.66 0.28 1.49 0.32 0.79 1.04 0.87 0.29 0.55 0.51

Sun Pharma Cipla GSK DRL Ranbaxy Divis Lupin Piramal Glenmark Cadila Biocon Avantis Pfizer Matrix Aztra Torrent Wyetn Aurobindo Novatis Wockhardt Dishman IPCA FDC Abbot Merck

Quick Ratio 2004 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Quick Ratio 2005

Quick Ratio 2006

Quick Ratio 2007

Quick Ratio 2008

Su

Ph ar m a Ci pl a G SK D Ra RL nb ax y D iv i Lu s pi Pi n r G ama len l m ar Ca k di Bi l a oc A on va nt i Pf s iz M er at ri x A ztr To a rre n W t A ye ur tn ob in N do W ova oc tis kh a D r dt ish m a IP n CA FD C A bb o M t er ck

n

21 Inventory Turnover 2005 2006 2007 3.68 3.91 4.11 2.00 2.04 2.26 3.58 3.85 3.59 2.78 2.53 3.40 2.26 2.25 2.30 1.71 1.31 1.91 3.34 3.56 3.35 3.02 3.61 4.24 2.30 2.07 1.92 3.32 3.39 2.56 5.96 4.62 3.80 4.30 3.80 3.60 4.26 4.21 3.81 2.43 2.72 2.39 3.52 4.75 4.42 2.00 2.36 2.70 2.69 3.01 2.98 2.72 3.01 2.83 4.52 5.22 4.58 4.87 3.57 3.06 1.61 1.86 2.11 2.65 2.79 2.64 3.87 3.09 2.96 7.65 7.22 5.68 5.80 5.61 5.28

Sun Pharma Cipla GSK DRL Ranbaxy Divis Lupin Piramal Glenmark Cadila Biocon Avantis Pfizer Matrix Aztra Torrent Wyetn Aurobindo Novatis Wockhardt Dishman IPCA FDC Abbot Merck

2004 3.12 2.18 3.52 3.24 2.63 2.06 3.56 3.98 2.19 3.99 3.90 4.70 3.45 2.73 2.19 2.67 2.57 3.78 5.78 4.52 1.73 2.77 3.59 9.13 5.14

2008 4.51 2.45 4.04 3.00 2.51 2.03 2.84 4.45 2.24 2.73 2.73 3.24 3.86 2.29 5.93 2.99 3.83 2.73 4.49 2.91 2.14 2.79 3.45 5.58 5.05

Inventory Turnover 2004 Inventory Turnover 2007 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00

Inventory Turnover 2005 Inventory Turnover 2008

Inventory Turnover 2006

Su n

Ph ar m a Ci pl a G SK D Ra RL nb ax y D iv is Lu pi Pi n r G ama len l m ar Ca k di B la io c A on va nt i Pf s iz M er at rix A zt To ra rre n W t A ye ur tn ob in N do W ova oc tis kh a D rdt ish m a IP n C A FD C A bb o M t er ck

22 Sun Pharma Cipla GSK DRL Ranbaxy Divis Lupin Piramal Glenmark Cadila Biocon Avantis Pfizer Matrix Aztra Torrent Wyetn Aurobindo Novatis Wockhardt Dishman IPCA FDC Abbot Merck 2004 47.34 93.01 20.69 93.94 43.93 87.58 65.86 43.20 125.24 52.27 79.33 28.06 40.00 57.58 39.32 32.97 34.70 126.49 47.47 71.54 107.15 74.34 36.32 14.23 58.03 Average Collection Period 2005 2006 2007 68.23 49.26 45.47 88.19 98.92 101.97 18.17 13.97 11.97 95.77 97.96 94.06 71.72 76.54 82.22 94.39 95.95 81.73 72.07 74.47 79.34 33.48 45.00 49.11 125.35 176.02 172.45 33.76 50.64 53.96 92.66 103.22 110.37 42.97 21.16 25.99 43.17 44.10 33.76 73.93 85.74 94.03 40.88 48.07 56.32 41.24 57.55 64.66 21.44 25.06 22.61 145.52 142.34 110.00 28.76 24.46 25.73 58.62 65.35 78.71 138.46 116.12 137.84 77.11 66.09 66.07 48.04 19.01 16.79 13.43 15.04 16.06 45.83 48.46 23.99 2008 115.11 114.11 7.54 88.91 71.93 71.48 79.19 54.84 151.80 56.63 56.63 21.76 21.64 124.43 55.89 73.72 23.57 118.80 23.61 92.15 105.14 84.00 13.79 16.10 31.65

Average Collection Period 2004 Average Collection Period 2007 200.00 180.00 160.00 140.00 120.00 100.00 80.00 60.00 40.00 20.00 0.00

Average Collection Period 2005 Average Collection Period 2008

Average Collection Period 2006

Sun Pharma

Ranbaxy

Glenmark

Aurobindo

Dishman

Divis

Avantis

Lupin

Piramal

Biocon

Pfizer

DRL

Torrent

Cipla

Cadila

Novatis

Matrix

Aztra

Wyetn

Wockhardt

Abbot

IPCA

GSK

FDC

Merck

23

Sun Pharma Cipla GSK DRL Ranbaxy Divis Lupin Piramal Glenmark Cadila Biocon Avantis Pfizer Matrix Aztra Torrent Wyetn Aurobindo Novatis Wockhardt Dishman IPCA FDC Abbot Merck

2004 1.47 1.19 2.76 1.40 2.07 0.98 1.24 1.65 1.05 1.14 1.52 2.13 2.45 1.32 1.84 1.35 1.65 1.06 3.39 1.68 0.72 1.41 1.75 5.46 2.08

Total Asset Turnover 2005 2006 2007 1.43 1.76 1.76 1.15 1.09 1.09 3.33 4.19 4.19 0.19 1.33 1.33 1.52 1.30 1.30 0.92 0.80 0.80 1.11 1.28 1.28 1.51 1.30 1.30 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.18 1.21 1.21 1.49 1.33 1.33 2.10 2.25 2.25 2.65 2.64 2.64 1.04 1.12 1.12 2.29 2.52 2.52 1.21 1.09 1.09 1.73 1.74 1.74 0.80 0.84 0.84 3.85 5.06 5.06 1.62 1.45 1.45 0.67 0.76 0.76 1.17 1.16 1.16 1.69 1.75 1.75 5.13 4.61 4.61 2.86 2.91 2.91

2008 1.57 1.03 4.78 1.40 1.40 1.08 1.35 1.44 1.13 1.28 1.28 2.40 4.34 0.66 2.65 1.18 2.93 1.06 5.04 1.14 0.78 1.23 1.68 3.41 3.26

Total Asset Turnover 2004 Total Asset Turnover 2007 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00

Total Asset Turnover 2005 Total Asset Turnover 2008

Total Asset Turnover 2006

Su n

Ph ar m a Ci pl a G SK D Ra RL nb ax y D iv i Lu s pi Pi n r G ama len l m ar Ca k di Bi l a oc A on va nt i Pf s iz M er at rix A ztr To a rre n W t A ye ur tn ob in N do W ova oc tis kh a D rdt ish m a IP n CA FD C A bb o M t er ck

24

Sun Pharma Cipla GSK DRL Ranbaxy Divis Lupin Piramal Glenmark Cadila Biocon Avantis Pfizer Matrix Aztra Torrent Wyetn Aurobindo Novatis Wockhardt Dishman IPCA FDC Abbot Merck

2004 1.77 0.91 1.59 1.73 1.23 0.81 0.87 0.90 0.98 0.95 1.75 1.03 1.43 0.87 0.97 0.88 1.45 1.15 1.70 1.76 0.92 0.90 1.25 2.02 1.26

Debt Ratio 2005 2006 3.38 3.01 0.84 0.84 2.05 2.30 0.28 1.98 1.02 1.16 0.82 0.97 0.89 1.19 0.89 1.08 1.18 1.54 1.00 1.08 1.71 1.68 1.21 1.35 1.57 1.47 1.04 1.34 1.23 1.38 1.28 0.98 1.83 1.54 1.21 1.23 2.15 2.99 2.63 2.25 0.99 1.48 0.89 0.87 1.16 1.37 2.09 2.03 1.83 2.10

2007 2.77 0.97 2.89 1.98 1.64 0.91 1.11 1.08 1.47 1.01 0.95 1.62 1.76 1.35 1.22 0.97 2.07 1.53 3.25 1.63 1.33 0.91 1.21 1.37 3.73

2008 2.05 1.02 3.62 2.03 1.73 0.96 1.07 1.10 1.25 1.28 1.28 1.78 2.76 1.11 1.39 1.13 2.24 1.31 3.78 1.54 1.46 1.01 1.32 1.05 3.89

Debt Ratio 2004 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Debt Ratio 2005

Debt Ratio 2006

Debt Ratio 2007

Debt Ratio 2008

Su

ar m a Ci pl a G SK D Ra RL nb ax y D iv i Lu s pi Pi n r G ama len l m ar Ca k di Bi l a oc A on va nt i Pf s iz M er at rix A ztr To a rre n W t A ye ur tn ob in N do W ova oc tis kh a D rdt ish m a IP n CA FD C A bb o M t er ck

n

Ph

25 Debt-to-Equity 2005 2006 2.36 1.92 0.57 0.73 0.48 0.42 0.83 1.06 0.44 0.85 0.86 0.97 1.14 1.68 0.95 0.81 2.11 2.78 0.62 0.69 0.75 0.82 0.77 0.67 0.53 0.45 0.55 0.74 0.25 0.59 1.07 1.07 0.51 0.57 1.74 1.90 0.61 0.62 1.84 1.59 1.41 2.36 1.24 1.07 0.71 0.79 0.58 0.62 0.68 0.70

Sun Pharma Cipla GSK DRL Ranbaxy Divis Lupin Piramal Glenmark Cadila Biocon Avantis Pfizer Matrix Aztra Torrent Wyetn Aurobindo Novatis Wockhardt Dishman IPCA FDC Abbot Merck

2004 1.06 0.58 0.53 0.83 0.48 0.90 1.03 1.13 1.04 1.12 0.85 0.60 0.55 1.22 0.51 0.56 0.72 1.55 0.60 1.16 2.06 1.09 0.75 0.36 0.58

2007 1.29 0.71 0.52 0.79 1.71 1.00 1.38 1.03 2.42 0.35 0.84 0.58 0.52 0.83 0.28 1.11 0.52 2.66 0.79 1.30 1.63 0.95 0.78 0.58 0.78

2008 0.76 0.78 0.53 0.81 1.63 0.83 1.22 1.00 1.14 0.90 0.90 0.70 0.65 1.03 0.45 1.04 0.49 2.00 0.71 1.35 1.34 1.06 0.74 0.41 0.84

Debt-to-Equity 2004 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Debt-to-Equity 2005

Debt-to-Equity 2006

Debt-to-Equity 2007

Debt-to-Equity 2008

Su n

Ph ar m a Ci pl a G SK D Ra RL nb ax y D iv i Lu s pi Pi n r G ama len l m ar Ca k di Bi l a oc A on va nt i Pf s iz M er at rix A ztr To a rre n W t A ye ur tn ob in N do W ova oc tis kh a D rdt ish m a IP n CA FD C A bb o M t er ck

26 Gross Profit Margin 2005 2006 2007 44.67% 45.03% 44.20% 37.75% 38.88% 39.08% 46.26% 51.68% 52.45% 46.28% 47.48% 58.98% 48.66% 47.21% 47.46% 39.11% 40.35% 44.75% 29.51% 34.39% 38.14% 45.20% 44.52% 43.03% 51.22% 50.30% 52.23% 44.77% 45.23% 47.05% 36.69% 32.32% 36.18% 43.12% 40.36% 39.69% 47.41% 44.00% 49.44% 37.70% 37.62% 34.98% 48.92% 48.57% 47.39% 44.41% 44.53% 45.48% 44.10% 53.12% 55.15% 19.25% 19.91% 24.19% 42.81% 45.12% 47.95% 50.88% 46.61% 43.38% 37.58% 34.61% 34.10% 37.26% 34.20% 37.91% 37.35% 41.91% 36.42% 36.92% 29.79% 27.88% 43.03% 43.04% 54.91%

Sun Pharma Cipla GSK DRL Ranbaxy Divis Lupin Piramal Glenmark Cadila Biocon Avantis Pfizer Matrix Aztra Torrent Wyetn Aurobindo Novatis Wockhardt Dishman IPCA FDC Abbot Merck

2004 48.39% 35.64% 39.50% 50.92% 53.23% 37.97% 35.11% 45.89% 52.11% 43.98% 37.84% 40.49% 43.57% 41.95% 42.04% 46.11% 42.56% 24.51% 43.67% 44.69% 38.50% 38.09% 42.44% 46.89% 35.03%

2008 46.76% 37.49% 53.88% 47.15% 49.76% 48.20% 38.06% 43.55% 56.50% 49.67% 49.67% 38.35% 64.04% -5.06% 53.44% 48.56% 55.71% 26.50% 49.39% 42.96% 32.29% 37.81% 36.38% 28.93% 48.25%

Gross Profit Margin 2004 Gross Profit Margin 2007 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% Sun Pharma Ranbaxy

Gross Profit Margin 2005 Gross Profit Margin 2008

Gross Profit Margin 2006

Aurobindo

Glenmark

Wockhardt

Dishman

Divis

Avantis

Lupin

Piramal

Biocon

Pfizer

0.00% -10.00%

DRL

Torrent

Novatis

Cipla

Cadila

Matrix

Aztra

Wyetn

Abbot

GSK

IPCA

FDC

Merck

27 Operating Profit Margin 2005 2006 2007 2008 25.82 26.67 26.46 % % % 32.03% 21.94 22.77 22.55 % % % 19.88% 32.09 38.57 41.26 % % % 44.74% 14.13 35.34 3.97% % % 17.00% 15.63 % 5.44% 11.88% 17.34% 27.36 27.92 32.76 % % % 36.60% 10.00 15.68 19.93 % % % 20.87% 15.30 16.00 15.56 % % % 20.36% 19.82 17.76 23.92 % % % 33.64% 14.85 15.98 16.45 % % % 17.66% 28.27 22.73 19.99 % % % 17.66% 29.41 27.18 26.34 % % % 22.92% 14.10 17.16 22.73 % % % 44.70% 25.42 25.94 15.51 % % % -34.54% 24.63 27.93 26.24 % % % 31.45% 12.39 13.21 15.68 % % % 19.27% 20.47 30.23 36.68 % % % 34.55% 10.49 14.78 7.44% % % 16.45% 19.48 24.40 22.50 % % % 24.53% 29.25 27.25 22.63 % % % 22.86% 23.32 23.03 22.38 % % % 21.58% 15.74 12.21 17.85 % % % 17.26% 19.88 22.48 18.04 % % % 15.97% 16.25 15.28 14.98 % % % 13.04%

Sun Pharma Cipla GSK DRL Ranbaxy Divis Lupin Piramal Glenmark Cadila Biocon Avantis Pfizer Matrix Aztra Torrent Wyetn Aurobindo Novatis Wockhardt Dishman IPCA FDC Abbot

2004 30.09 % 21.16 % 23.42 % 18.06 % 24.31 % 27.01 % 17.26 % 17.85 % 16.69 % 15.97 % 28.62 % 21.05 % 9.39% 28.65 % 20.59 % 19.05 % 22.64 % 16.08 % 19.43 % 21.18 % 24.18 % 17.27 % 26.39 % 26.96 %

28 Merck 18.56 % 28.04 % 28.43 % 40.35 % 28.22%

Operating Profit Margin 2004 Gross Profit Margin 2007 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% Sun Pharma Glenmark Ranbaxy

Gross Profit Margin 2005 Gross Profit Margin 2008

Gross Profit Margin 2006

Aurobindo

Dishman

Avantis

Divis

Lupin

Piramal

Biocon

Pfizer

0.00% -10.00% -20.00% -30.00% -40.00%

DRL

Torrent

Cipla

Novatis

Cadila

Aztra

Wyetn

Matrix

Wockhardt

Abbot

GSK

IPCA

FDC

Merck

29 Net Profit Margin 2005 2006 2007 2008 24.38 25.21 25.98 % % % 30.88% 17.08 19.06 18.39 % % % 16.36% 21.86 28.58 30.50 % % % 32.94% 10.51 29.37 4.50% % % 13.60% 12.81 % 5.33% 8.99% 12.22% 17.09 17.38 26.50 % % % 32.91% 10.83 13.66 7.27% % % 15.43% 12.24 11.22% % 11.18% 15.30% 12.14 15.57 % 11.63% % 27.56% 12.60 12.86 11.32% % % 12.97% 25.77 18.58 17.66 % % % 12.97% 19.30 17.97 17.84 % % % 14.77% 15.14 9.06% 11.05% % 33.81% 19.56 21.37 12.41 % % % -43.85% 14.51 18.55 17.07 % % % 20.27% 10.14 12.25 % 9.47% % 16.05% 18.98 24.74 30.15 % % % 23.82% 3.05% 5.09% 11.07% 11.78% 10.98 16.58 14.00 % % % 15.32% 23.77 22.87 18.36 % % % 15.78% 17.62 19.08 19.63 % % % 16.08% 10.77 12.33 % 8.33% % 12.14% 15.38 18.50 14.12 % % % 13.20% 10.39 10.06 11.04% % % 8.55% 18.76 19.18 33.05 19.44%

Sun Pharma Cipla GSK DRL Ranbaxy Divis Lupin Piramal Glenmark Cadila Biocon Avantis Pfizer Matrix Aztra Torrent Wyetn Aurobindo Novatis Wockhardt Dishman IPCA FDC Abbot Merck

2004 26.54 % 15.91 % 14.46 % 16.63 % 20.03 % 17.99 % 8.37% 15.60 % 11.20% 11.53% 23.69 % 14.26 % 5.77% 21.17 % 13.13 % 13.63 % 18.72 % 10.11% 17.86 % 18.05 % 13.78 % 11.89% 21.95 % 20.08 % 12.27

30 % % % %

Net Profit Margin 2004 Net Profit Margin 2007 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% Sun Pharma Ranbaxy Glenmark

Net Profit Margin 2005 Net Profit Margin 2008

Net Profit Margin 2006

Aurobindo

Dishman

Lupin

Divis

Avantis

Piramal

Biocon

Pfizer

0.00% -10.00% -20.00% -30.00% -40.00% -50.00%

DRL

Torrent

Novatis

Cipla

Cadila

Matrix

Aztra

Wyetn

Wockhardt

Abbot

IPCA

GSK

FDC

Merck

31 Return on Total Assets (ROA) 2005 2006 2007 2008 34.96 % 44.27% 50.28% 48.56% 19.61 % 20.71% 19.35% 16.91% 72.74 133.39 % 119.68% % 157.52% 0.85% 13.93% 50.00% 19.07% 19.44 % 6.91% 11.15% 17.10% 15.68 % 13.82% 25.06% 35.54% 8.10% 13.90% 18.84% 20.79% 16.90 % 15.91% 13.98% 22.09% 10.38 % 9.92% 14.81% 31.27% 13.37 % 15.27% 15.54% 16.58% 38.38 % 24.74% 14.38% 16.58% 40.61 % 40.35% 44.99% 35.47% 24.06 % 29.13% 44.97% 146.64% 20.27 % 23.88% 11.13% -28.78% 33.23 % 46.84% 41.79% 53.74% 12.26 % 10.34% 14.77% 18.89% 32.93 % 43.08% 74.01% 69.78% 2.43% 4.28% 11.91% 12.51% 42.26 % 83.91% 67.90% 77.30% 38.58 % 33.25% 20.92% 17.99% 11.77% 14.56% 14.50% 12.53% 12.55 % 9.64% 15.33% 14.88% 25.92 % 32.42% 23.18% 22.17% 56.56 % 47.91% 40.50% 29.15% 53.67 131.80 % 55.72% % 63.33%

2004 Sun Pharma Cipla GSK DRL Ranbaxy Divis Lupin Piramal Glenmark Cadila Biocon Avantis Pfizer Matrix Aztra Torrent Wyetn Aurobindo Novatis Wockhardt Dishman IPCA FDC Abbot Merck 39.10% 18.94% 39.95% 23.21% 41.46% 17.71% 10.36% 25.80% 11.76% 13.17% 36.08% 30.36% 14.13% 27.98% 24.23% 18.41% 30.86% 10.73% 60.48% 30.29% 9.86% 16.81% 38.39% 109.54 % 25.51%

32
Return on Total Assets (ROA) 2004 Return on Total Assets (ROA) 2007 200.00% Return on Total Assets (ROA) 2005 Return on Total Assets (ROA) 2008 Return on Total Assets (ROA) 2006

150.00%

100.00%

50.00%

0.00%
Ph ar m a Ci pl a G SK D Ra RL nb ax y D iv is Lu p Pi in ra G ma len l m ar Ca k di Bi l a oc A on va nt is Pf iz M er at ri x A ztr To a rre n W t A ye ur t n ob in N do ov W oc atis kh a D r dt ish m a IP n CA FD C A bb o M t er ck

-50.00%

Su n

33 Return on Equity (ROE) 2005 2006 2007 2008 27.35 32.26 26.04 % % % 24.22% 26.52 30.78 20.70 % % % 19.20% 35.64 52.31 46.43 % % % 43.65% 27.14 3.41% 9.92% % 10.28% 20.14 16.01 % 8.51% % 23.52% 23.48 20.56 35.41 % % % 40.63% 17.08 28.33 33.44 % % % 33.66% 31.15 17.65 17.85 % % % 29.93% 22.14 30.40 % 21.11% % 37.83% 21.39 22.52 23.20 % % % 22.11% 24.92 16.65 16.84 % % % 22.11% 36.75 30.79 28.59 % % % 20.32% 15.89 19.85 25.57 % % % 53.23% 20.87 20.98 10.18 % % % -43.07% 26.96 33.85 34.39 % % % 38.58% 15.52 17.21 24.33 % % % 26.57% 18.20 28.29 36.05 % % % 31.50% 24.33 4.23% 8.09% % 23.36% 20.09 28.63 21.38 % % % 20.51% 33.96 29.62 22.33 % % % 20.84% 20.83 27.00 % % 23.11% 13.58% 23.40 16.81 25.01 % % % 23.28% 22.87 24.10 19.41 % % % 17.39% 27.34 23.79 29.62 % % % 27.96%

Sun Pharma Cipla GSK DRL Ranbaxy Divis Lupin Piramal Glenmark Cadila Biocon Avantis Pfizer Matrix Aztra Torrent Wyetn Aurobindo Novatis Wockhardt Dishman IPCA FDC Abbot

2004 30.14 % 24.47 % 25.30 % 13.84 % 34.17 % 27.99 % 22.04 % 55.35 % 17.87 % 24.41 % 23.08 % 32.40 % 9.92% 70.11% 25.07 % 20.82 % 21.51 % 17.37 % 36.37 % 28.17 % 30.34 % 29.03 % 32.87 % 54.83 %

34 Merck 20.20 % 29.33 % 26.54 % 35.37 % 16.27%

Return on Equity (ROE) 2004 Return on Equity (ROE) 2007 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00% -20.00% -40.00% -60.00%

Return on Equity (ROE) 2005 Return on Equity (ROE) 2008

Return on Equity (ROE) 2006

dc Ranbaxy Sun Pharma Aurobindo Glenmark Dishman Divis Lupin Avantis Pfizer

Piramal

Biocon

DRL

Torrent

Novatis

Cipla

Cadila

Matrix

Aztra

Wyetn

Wockhardt

Abbot

IPCA

GSK

FDC

Merck

35
Adjusted Earnings per Share 2005 2006 2007 32.589 50.880 65.949 68.262 101.324 42.971 37.728 58.587 65.494 18.481 58.527 141.359 27.152 10.863 20.178 51.942 54.657 148.675 21.293 45.441 36.979 44.737 40.933 45.103 26.762 28.345 56.997 41.847 52.803 32.596 34.616 26.700 31.672 64.464 67.768 73.513 19.223 25.044 37.681 43.492 59.349 32.313 51.520 86.120 97.480 25.005 15.559 26.701 19.428 30.559 40.726 13.127 27.503 84.792 35.757 60.488 51.990 38.670 43.640 39.028 21.318 33.372 42.867 31.604 25.952 48.624 28.195 36.243 33.413 38.724 38.272 47.291 43.173 46.922 82.444

Sun Pharma Cipla GSK DRL Ranbaxy Divis Lupin Piramal Glenmark Cadila Biocon Avantis Pfizer Matrix Aztra Torrent Wyetn Aurobindo Novatis Wockhardt Dishman IPCA FDC Abbot Merck

2004 55.889 51.157 22.676 74.022 42.719 50.047 50.047 59.134 35.443 41.943 24.932 42.579 10.826 101.317 49.160 30.232 24.177 51.777 58.210 36.736 18.272 64.024 68.135 67.559 23.511

2008 98.407 46.277 70.132 58.798 31.997 275.089 54.016 72.792 156.425 37.102 100.670 61.003 115.700 (94.709) 122.920 36.760 35.823 106.094 57.566 39.084 38.507 56.373 33.855 45.219 40.819

Adjusted Earnings per Share 2004 Adjusted Earnings per Share 2007 300.000 250.000 200.000 150.000 100.000 50.000 0.000 (50.000) (100.000) (150.000)

Adjusted Earnings per Share 2005 Adjusted Earnings per Share 2008

Adjusted Earnings per Share 2006

Ranbaxy

Sun Pharma

Aurobindo

Glenmark

Wockhardt

Dishman

Divis

Avantis

Lupin

Piramal

Biocon

Pfizer

DRL

Torrent

Cadila

Matrix

Wyetn

Novatis

Cipla

Aztra

Abbot

IPCA

GSK

FDC

Merck

36
Price/Earnings Ratio 2005 2006 2007 28.63 33.60 31.18 18.74 32.32 27.46 19.06 24.84 17.12 79.99 48.57 10.30 36.65 79.60 34.88 19.18 34.32 20.68 25.69 24.51 16.39 52.91 22.21 23.55 19.18 38.05 18.01 17.70 44.33 19.03 29.61 9.50 16.06 55.58 18.02 33.37 28.47 46.12 23.73 27.91 48.24 23.20 28.83 13.52 13.48 53.62 20.66 30.70 16.75 21.29 27.08 31.29 14.66 11.18 16.01 20.39 24.74 12.38 9.30

Sun Pharma Cipla GSK DRL Ranbaxy Divis Lupin Piramal Glenmark Cadila Biocon Avantis Pfizer Matrix Aztra Torrent Wyetn Aurobindo Novatis Wockhardt Dishman IPCA FDC Abbot Merck

2004 23.32 22.93 26.76 26.33 22.00 29.02 29.02 20.27 21.66 38.83 16.82 42.98 13.48 10.78 14.87 21.52 29.62 10.16 15.88

2008 24.98 23.77 14.88 20.11 27.41 23.07 9.23 31.26 13.66 8.55 12.54 5.92 21.14 7.66 12.74 5.49 13.63 36.00 10.95 8.31 8.17

Price/Earnings Ratio 2004 Price/Earnings Ratio 2007 90.00 80.00 70.00 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00

Price/Earnings Ratio 2005 Price/Earnings Ratio 2008

Price/Earnings Ratio 2006

Su

Ph ar m a Ci pl a G SK D Ra RL nb ax y D iv i Lu s pi Pi n r G ama len l m a Ca rk di B i la oc A on va nt i Pf s iz M er at rix A ztr To a rre W nt A ye ur tn ob in N do W ova oc ti s kh a D r dt ish m a IP n CA FD C A bb o M t er ck

n

37

38 PROFITABILITY RATIO: Financial Ratio Formula Return on Total Assets Operating profit before income tax + interest expense/ Average total assets Operating profit & extraordinary items after income tax minus Preference dividends / Average ordinary shareholders’ equity Gross Profit / Net Sales Measurements Measures rate of return earned through operating total assets provided by both creditors and owners Measures rate of return earned on assets provided by owners

Return on ordinary shareholders’ equity Gross Profit Margin Profit Margin

Profitability of trading and mark-up Measures net Operating profit after income profitability of each tax / Net Sales Revenue rupees of sales

39 MARKET BASED FINANCIAL RATIO: Financial Ratio Earnings per share Formula Operating profits after income tax less Preference dividends / Weighted average number of ordinary shares issued Market price per ordinary share / Earnings per ordinary share Measurements Measures profit earned on each ordinary share

Measures the amount investors are paying for a rupees of earnings Measures the return Earnings per ordinary share to an investor Earning Yield / Market price per ordinary purchasing shares at share the current market price. Measures the rate of Annual dividend per ordinary return to shareholders Dividend Yield share / Market price per based on current ordinary share market price. Measures the Total dividend per ordinary percentage of profits Dividend Payout share / Market price per paid out to ordinary ordinary share shareholders Ordinary shareholders’ Net Asset Measure the assets equity / No of ordinary Backing (NTA) backing per share shares Price-earnings ratio

40 LIQUIDITY RATIO: Financial Ratio Formula Measurements A measure of shortterm liquidity. Current Assets / Current Indicates the ability liabilities of entity to meet its short-term debts from its current assets A more rigorous measure of shortterm liquidity. Current Assets less Indicates the ability inventory / Current liabilities of the entity to meet unexpected demands from liquid current asses

Current Ratio

Quick Ratio

41

ASSET MANAGEMENT/UTILISATION/ACTIVITY RATIOS: Financial Ratio Measurements Measures the effectiveness of Receivables Net sales revenue / Average collections; used to turnover receivables balance evaluate whether receivables balance is excessive Measures the Average receivables average number of Average balance x 365 / Net sales days taken by an collection period revenue entity to collect its receivables Indicates the liquidity of inventory. Measures the Inventory Cost of goods sold / number of times turnover Average inventory balance inventory was sold on the average during the period Measures the effectiveness of an Total Asset Net sales revenue / Average entity in using its turnover ratio total assets assets during the period. Measure the Turnover of efficiency of the Net Sales / Fixed Assets Fixed Assets usage of fixed assets in generating sales Formula

42 GEARING/FINANCIAL STABILITY RATIO: Financial Ratio Measurements Measures percentage of assets Debt ratio Total Liabilities / Total assets provided by creditors and extent of using gearing Measures percentage of assets Equity ratio or Total shareholders’ equity / provided by Proprietary ratio Total assets shareholders and the extent of using gearing The reciprocal of the Capitalization Total assets / Total equity ratio and thus ratio shareholders’ equity measures the same thing Operating profit before Measures the ability Times interest income tax + Interest of the entity to meet earned expense / Interest expense its interest payments + Interest capitalized out of current profits. Formula

43 CASH SUFFICIENCY RATIO: Financial Ratio Cash flow adequacy Formula Cash from operations / Longterm debt paid + Assets acquired + Dividends paid Long-term debt repayments / Cash from operations Measurements Measures the entity’s ability to cover its main cash requirements

Long-term debt repayment Dividend payment

Reinvestment

Debt coverage

Measures the entity’s ability to cover its long-term debt out of cash from operations Dividends paid / Measures the entity’s Cash from ability to cover its operations dividend payment Measures the entity’s Non-current asset ability to pay for its payments / Cash non-current assets from operations out of cash from operations Measures the Total long-term debt / payback period for Cash from coverage of longoperations term debt.

44 CASH FLOW EFFICIENCY RATIO: Financial Ratio Cash flow to sales Formula Measurements Measures ability to Cash from convert sales operations / Net revenue into cash sales revenue flows An index measuring Cash from the relationship operations / between profit from Operating profit operations and after income tax operating cash flows Cash from Measures the operation + Tax operating cash flow paid + Interest paid return on assets / Average total before interest and assets tax

Operation index

Cash flow return on assets

45
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chapter 7 -- Conclusions

Among the companies studied the quick ratio was at comfortable level for all the companies except Glenmark (1.58, Aurobindo 1.48) for the year 2008 show that the Indian pharmaceutical companies are better solvent. The asset to turnover ratio of GloxoSmithklin (4,.78), Pfizer (4.3), Novatis (5.04), are the top 3 three and have better asset utilization compared to Dishman (0.78), matrix (0.66), Cipla (1.03), Aurobindo (1.06), Divis (1.08) and these companies could improve the financials by better asset utilization. Dept to equity ratio of Aurobino (2.0), Ranbaxy (1.63) are highly leveraged and those of Abbot (0.41), Wyeth (0.49), Aztra (0.45) GloxoSmithkline (0.53) are least leveraged. The net profit margin of Sun pharmaceuticals (30.88%), GloxoSmithkline (32.94%), and Divis (32.91%) are most profitability ratio and those of Matrix (-43.85%), Abbot (8.55%), Ranbaxy (12.2%), Aurobindo (11.78%), IPCA (12.14%) have low profit margin in the operation. The retun on equty is higher for Pfizer (53.2%), Divis (40.63%), GloxoSmithkline (43.65%) are giving high return on equity and those of Matrix (-43.07%), Dr. Reddy’s (10.28%), Dishman (13.58%) are much lower.

46
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reference
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.

Prof. C. Jeevanadam, Sardar Vallabhbhai Institute of Textile Management, Coimbatore, Notes on Financial Statements, Short Term Programme on Financial Management at Bannari Amman Institute of Technology, Sathyamangalam on 05.01.2005. Principles of Accounting, Dr. Vinayagam, P. C. Mani, K. L. Nagarajan, Kalyani Publications, New Delhi, 2002. Financial Management, Dr. R. S. Kulsherestha, Kalyani Publications, New Delhi,2002 Dr. B. K. Behra, Class notes on Costing and Management,IIT-Delhi,2003 Corporate Finance: Theory and Practice By S. R. Vishwanath The Indian Pharmaceutical Industry – An Overview of Internal Efficiencies using Data Envelopment Analysis - Haritha Saranga1 and B.V. Phani Annual reports of Indian pharmaceutical companies and consolidated balance sheets published as a part of Annual reports. Scrip report on Indian Pharmaceutical Industry. Research reports published by various agencies and brokerage houses on Indian Pharmaceutical Industries.

2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

MBA Project on Financial Ratios

INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVE:
To understand the information contained in financial statements with a view to know the strength or weaknesses of the firm and to make forecast about the future prospects of the firm and thereby enabling the financial analyst to take different decisions regarding the operations of the firm.

RATIO ANALYSIS:
Fundamental Analysis has a very broad scope. One aspect looks at the general (qualitative) factors of a company. The other side considers tangible and measurable factors (quantitative). This means crunching and analyzing numbers from the financial statements. If used in conjunction with other methods, quantitative analysis can produce excellent results.

Ratio analysis isn't just comparing different numbers from the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement. It's comparing the number against previous years, other companies, the industry, or even the economy in general. Ratios look at the relationships between individual values and relate them to how a company has performed in the past, and might perform in the future.

MEANING OF RATIO:
A ratio is one figure express in terms of another figure. It is a mathematical yardstick that measures the relationship two figures, which are related to each other and mutually interdependent. Ratio is express by dividing one figure by the other related figure. Thus a ratio is an expression relating one number to another. It is simply the quotient of two numbers. It can be expressed as a fraction or as a decimal or as a pure ratio or in absolute figures as “ so 1

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com many times”. As accounting ratio is an expression relating two figures or accounts or two sets of account heads or group contain in the financial statements.

MEANING OF RATIO ANALYSIS:
Ratio analysis is the method or process by which the relationship of items or group of items in the financial statement are computed, determined and presented. Ratio analysis is an attempt to derive quantitative measure or guides concerning the financial health and profitability of business enterprises. Ratio analysis can be used both in trend and static analysis. There are several ratios at the disposal of an annalist but their group of ratio he would prefer depends on the purpose and the objective of analysis. While a detailed explanation of ratio analysis is beyond the scope of this section, we will focus on a technique, which is easy to use. It can provide you with a valuable investment analysis tool. This technique is called cross-sectional analysis. Cross-sectional analysis compares financial ratios of several companies from the same industry. Ratio analysis can provide valuable information about a company's financial health. A financial ratio measures a company's performance in a specific area. For example, you could use a ratio of a company's debt to its equity to measure a company's leverage. By comparing the leverage ratios of two companies, you can determine which company uses greater debt in the conduct of its business. A company whose leverage ratio is higher than a competitor's has more debt per equity. You can use this information to make a judgment as to which company is a better investment risk. However, you must be careful not to place too much importance on one ratio. You obtain a better indication of the direction in which a company is moving when several ratios are taken as a group.

2

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

OBJECTIVE OF RATIOS
Ratio is work out to analyze the following aspects of business organizationA) Solvency1) Long term 2) Short term 3) Immediate B) Stability C) Profitability D) Operational efficiency E) Credit standing F) Structural analysis G) Effective utilization of resources H) Leverage or external financing

FORMS OF RATIO:
Since a ratio is a mathematical relationship between to or more variables / accounting figures, such relationship can be expressed in different ways as follows – A] As a pure ratio: For example the equity share capital of a company is Rs. 20,00,000 & the preference share capital is Rs. 5,00,000, the ratio of equity share capital to preference share capital is 20,00,000: 5,00,000 or simply 4:1. B] As a rate of times: In the above case the equity share capital may also be described as 4 times that of preference share capital. Similarly, the cash sales of a firm are

3

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com Rs. 12,00,000 & credit sales are Rs. 30,00,000. so the ratio of credit sales to cash sales can be described as 2.5 [30,00,000/12,00,000] or simply by saying that the credit sales are 2.5 times that of cash sales. C] As a percentage: In such a case, one item may be expressed as a percentage of some other item. For example, net sales of the firm are Rs.50,00,000 & the amount of the gross profit is Rs. 10,00,000, then the gross profit may be described as 20% of sales [ 10,00,000/50,00,000]

STEPS IN RATIO ANALYSIS
The ratio analysis requires two steps as follows: 1] Calculation of ratio 2] Comparing the ratio with some predetermined standards. The standard ratio may be the past ratio of the same firm or industry’s average ratio or a projected ratio or the ratio of the most successful firm in the industry. In interpreting the ratio of a particular firm, the analyst cannot reach any fruitful conclusion unless the calculated ratio is compared with some predetermined standard. The importance of a correct standard is oblivious as the conclusion is going to be based on the standard itself.

TYPES OF COMPARISONS
The ratio can be compared in three different ways – 1] Cross section analysis: One of the way of comparing the ratio or ratios of the firm is to compare them with the ratio or ratios of some other selected firm in the same industry at the same point of time. So it involves the comparison of two or more firm’s

4

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com financial ratio at the same point of time. The cross section analysis helps the analyst to find out as to how a particular firm has performed in relation to its competitors. The firms performance may be compared with the performance of the leader in the industry in order to uncover the major operational inefficiencies. The cross section analysis is easy to be undertaken as most of the data required for this may be available in financial statement of the firm. 2] Time series analysis: The analysis is called Time series analysis when the performance of a firm is evaluated over a period of time. By comparing the present performance of a firm with the performance of the same firm over the last few years, an assessment can be made about the trend in progress of the firm, about the direction of progress of the firm. Time series analysis helps to the firm to assess whether the firm is approaching the long-term goals or not. The Time series analysis looks for (1) important trends in financial performance (2) shift in trend over the years (3) significant deviation if any from the other set of data\ 3] Combined analysis: If the cross section & time analysis, both are combined together to study the behavior & pattern of ratio, then meaningful & comprehensive evaluation of the performance of the firm can definitely be made. A trend of ratio of a firm compared with the trend of the ratio of the standard firm can give good results. For example, the ratio of operating expenses to net sales for firm may be higher than the industry average however, over the years it has been declining for the firm, whereas the industry average has not shown any significant changes.

5

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

The combined analysis as depicted in the above diagram, which clearly shows that the ratio of the firm is above the industry average, but it is decreasing over the years & is approaching the industry average.

PRE-REQUISITIES TO RATIO ANALYSIS
In order to use the ratio analysis as device to make purposeful conclusions, there are certain pre-requisites, which must be taken care of. It may be noted that these prerequisites are not conditions for calculations for meaningful conclusions. The accounting figures are inactive in them & can be used for any ratio but meaningful & correct interpretation & conclusion can be arrived at only if the following points are well considered. 1) The dates of different financial statements from where data is taken must be same. 2) If possible, only audited financial statements should be considered, otherwise there must be sufficient evidence that the data is correct.

6

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com 3) Accounting policies followed by different firms must be same in case of cross section analysis otherwise the results of the ratio analysis would be distorted. 4) One ratio may not throw light on any performance of the firm. Therefore, a group of ratios must be preferred. This will be conductive to counter checks. 5) Last but not least, the analyst must find out that the two figures being used to calculate a ratio must be related to each other, otherwise there is no purpose of calculating a ratio.

CLASSIFICATION OF RATIO
CLASSIFICATION OF RATIO

BASED ON FINANCIAL USER STATEMENT

BASED ON FUNCTION

BASED ON

1] BALANCE SHEET RATIO 2] REVENUE STATEMENT RATIO 3] COMPOSITE RATIO

1] LIQUIDITY RATIO 2] LEVERAGE RATIO 3] ACTIVITY RATIO 4] PROFITABILITY RATIO 5] COVERAGE RATIO

1] RATIOS FOR SHORT TERM CREDITORS 2] RATIO FOR SHAREHOLDER 3] RATIOS FOR MANAGEMENT 4] RATIO FOR LONG TERM CREDITORS

7

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

BASED ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT
Accounting ratios express the relationship between figures taken from financial statements. Figures may be taken from Balance Sheet , P& P A/C, or both. One-way of classification of ratios is based upon the sources from which are taken. 1] Balance sheet ratio: If the ratios are based on the figures of balance sheet, they are called Balance Sheet Ratios. E.g. ratio of current assets to current liabilities or ratio of debt to equity. While calculating these ratios, there is no need to refer to the Revenue statement. These ratios study the relationship between the assets & the liabilities, of the concern. These ratio help to judge the liquidity, solvency & capital structure of the concern. Balance sheet ratios are Current ratio, Liquid ratio, and Proprietory ratio, Capital gearing ratio, Debt equity ratio, and Stock working capital ratio. 2] Revenue ratio: Ratio based on the figures from the revenue statement is called revenue statement ratios. These ratio study the relationship between the profitability & the sales of the concern. Revenue ratios are Gross profit ratio, Operating ratio, Expense ratio, Net profit ratio, Net operating profit ratio, Stock turnover ratio. 3] Composite ratio: These ratios indicate the relationship between two items, of which one is found in the balance sheet & other in revenue statement. There are two types of composite ratiosa) Some composite ratios study the relationship between the profits & the investments of the concern. E.g. return on capital employed, return on proprietors fund, return on equity capital etc. b) Other composite ratios e.g. debtors turnover ratios, creditors turnover ratios, dividend payout ratios, & debt service ratios

8

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

BASED ON FUNCTION:
Accounting ratios can also be classified according to their functions in to liquidity ratios, leverage ratios, activity ratios, profitability ratios & turnover ratios. 1] Liquidity ratios: It shows the relationship between the current assets & current liabilities of the concern e.g. liquid ratios & current ratios. 2] Leverage ratios: It shows the relationship between proprietors funds & debts used in financing the assets of the concern e.g. capital gearing ratios, debt equity ratios, & Proprietory ratios. 3] Activity ratios: It shows relationship between the sales & the assets. It is also known as Turnover ratios & productivity ratios e.g. stock turnover ratios, debtors turnover ratios. 4] Profitability ratios: a) It shows the relationship between profits & sales e.g. operating ratios, gross profit ratios, operating net profit ratios, expenses ratios b) It shows the relationship between profit & investment e.g. return on investment, return on equity capital. 5] Coverage ratios: It shows the relationship between the profit on the one hand & the claims of the outsiders to be paid out of such profit e.g. dividend payout ratios & debt service ratios.

9

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

BASED ON USER:
1] Ratios for short-term creditors: Current ratios, liquid ratios, stock working capital ratios 2] Ratios for the shareholders: Return on proprietors fund, return on equity capital 3] Ratios for management: Return on capital employed, turnover ratios, operating ratios, expenses ratios 4] Ratios for long-term creditors: Debt equity ratios, return on capital employed, proprietor ratios.

10

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

LIQUIDITY RATIO: Liquidity refers to the ability of a firm to meet its short-term (usually up to 1 year) obligations. The ratios, which indicate the liquidity of a company, are Current ratio, Quick/Acid-Test ratio, and Cash ratio. These ratios are discussed below

CURRENT RATIO
Meaning: This ratio compares the current assests with the current liabilities. It is also known as ‘working capital ratio’ or ‘ solvency ratio’. It is expressed in the form of pure ratio. E.g. 2:1 Formula: Current assets Current ratio = Current liabilities

11

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com The current assests of a firm represents those assets which can be, in the ordinary course of business, converted into cash within a short period time, normally not exceeding one year. The current liabilities defined as liabilities which are short term maturing obligations to be met, as originally contemplated, with in a year. Current ratio (CR) is the ratio of total current assets (CA) to total current liabilities (CL). Current assets include cash and bank balances; inventory of raw materials, semi-finished and finished goods; marketable securities; debtors (net of provision for bad and doubtful debts); bills receivable; and prepaid expenses. Current liabilities consist of trade creditors, bills payable, bank credit, provision for taxation, dividends payable and outstanding expenses. This ratio measures the liquidity of the current assets and the ability of a company to meet its shortterm debt obligation. CR measures the ability of the company to meet its CL, i.e., CA gets converted into cash in the operating cycle of the firm and provides the funds needed to pay for CL. The higher the current ratio, the greater the short-term solvency. This compares assets, which will become liquid within approximately twelve months with liabilities, which will be due for payment in the same period and is intended to indicate whether there are sufficient short-term assets to meet the short- term liabilities. Recommended current ratio is 2: 1. Any ratio below indicates that the entity may face liquidity problem but also Ratio over 2: 1 as above indicates over trading, that is the entity is under utilizing its current assets.

LIQUID RATIO:
Meaning: Liquid ratio is also known as acid test ratio or quick ratio. Liquid ratio compare the quick assets with the quick liabilities. It is expressed in the form of pure ratio. E.g. 1:1.

12

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com The term quick assets refer to current assets, which can be converted into, cash immediately or at a short notice without diminution of value. Formula: Quick assets Liquid ratio = Quick liabilities Quick Ratio (QR) is the ratio between quick current assets (QA) and CL. QA refers to those current assets that can be converted into cash immediately without any value strength. QA includes cash and bank balances, short-term marketable securities, and sundry debtors. Inventory and prepaid expenses are excluded since these cannot be turned into cash as and when required. QR indicates the extent to which a company can pay its current liabilities without relying on the sale of inventory. This is a fairly stringent measure of liquidity because it is based on those current assets, which are highly liquid. Inventories are excluded from the numerator of this ratio because they are deemed the least liquid component of current assets. Generally, a quick ratio of 1:1 is considered good. One drawback of the quick ratio is that it ignores the timing of receipts and payments.

CASH RATIO
Meaning: This is also called as super quick ratio. This ratio considers only the absolute liquidity available with the firm. Formula: Cash + Bank + Marketable securities Cash ratio = Total current liabilities

13

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com Since cash and bank balances and short term marketable securities are the most liquid assets of a firm, financial analysts look at the cash ratio. If the super liquid assets are too much in relation to the current liabilities then it may affect the profitability of the firm.

INVESTMENT / SHAREHOLDER

EARNING PER SAHRE:Meaning: Earnings per Share are calculated to find out overall profitability of the organization. An earnings per Share represents earning of the company whether or not dividends are declared. If there is only one class of shares, the earning per share are determined by dividing net profit by the number of equity shares. EPS measures the profits available to the equity shareholders on each share held.

14

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com Formula: NPAT Earning per share = Number of equity share The higher EPS will attract more investors to acquire shares in the company as it indicates that the business is more profitable enough to pay the dividends in time. But remember not all profit earned is going to be distributed as dividends the company also retains some profits for the business

DIVIDEND PER SHARE:Meaning:
DPS shows how much is paid as dividend to the shareholders on each share held. Formula: Dividend Paid to Ordinary Shareholders Dividend per Share = Number of Ordinary Shares

DIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO:Meaning: Dividend Pay-out Ratio shows the relationship between the dividend paid to equity shareholders out of the profit available to the equity shareholders.

15

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com Formula: Dividend per share

Dividend Pay out ratio =
Earning per share

*100

D/P ratio shows the percentage share of net profits after taxes and after preference dividend has been paid to the preference equity holders.

GEARING

CAPITAL GEARING RATIO:Meaning: Gearing means the process of increasing the equity shareholders return through the use of debt. Equity shareholders earn more when the rate of the return on total capital is more than the rate of interest on debts. This is also known as leverage or trading on equity. The Capital-gearing ratio shows the relationship between two types of capital viz: - equity capital & preference capital & long term borrowings. It is expressed as a pure ratio.

16

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

Formula: Preference capital+ secured loan Capital gearing ratio = Equity capital & reserve & surplus Capital gearing ratio indicates the proportion of debt & equity in the financing of assets of a concern.

PROFITABILITY
These ratios help measure the profitability of a firm. A firm, which generates a substantial amount of profits per rupee of sales, can comfortably meet its operating expenses and provide more returns to its shareholders. The relationship between profit and sales is measured by profitability ratios. There are two types of profitability ratios: Gross Profit Margin and Net Profit Margin.

17

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com GROSS PROFIT RATIO:Meaning: This ratio measures the relationship between gross profit and sales. It is defined as the excess of the net sales over cost of goods sold or excess of revenue over cost. This ratio shows the profit that remains after the manufacturing costs have been met. It measures the efficiency of production as well as pricing. This ratio helps to judge how efficient the concern is I managing its production, purchase, selling & inventory, how good its control is over the direct cost, how productive the concern , how much amount is left to meet other expenses & earn net profit. Formula: Gross profit Gross profit ratio = Net sales NET PROFIT RATIO:Meaning: Net Profit ratio indicates the relationship between the net profit & the sales it is usually expressed in the form of a percentage. Formula: NPAT Net profit ratio = Net sales This ratio shows the net earnings (to be distributed to both equity and preference shareholders) as a percentage of net sales. It measures the overall efficiency of production, administration, selling, financing, pricing and tax 18 * 100 * 100

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com management. Jointly considered, the gross and net profit margin ratios provide an understanding of the cost and profit structure of a firm. RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED:Meaning: The profitability of the firm can also be analyzed from the point of view of the total funds employed in the firm. The term fund employed or the capital employed refers to the total long-term source of funds. It means that the capital employed comprises of shareholder funds plus long-term debts. Alternatively it can also be defined as fixed assets plus net working capital. Capital employed refers to the long-term funds invested by the creditors and the owners of a firm. It is the sum of long-term liabilities and owner's equity. ROCE indicates the efficiency with which the long-term funds of a firm are utilized. Formula: NPAT Return on capital employed = Capital employed *100

FINANCIAL
These ratios determine how quickly certain current assets can be converted into cash. They are also called efficiency ratios or asset utilization ratios as they measure the efficiency of a firm in managing assets. These ratios are based on the relationship between the level of activity represented by sales or cost of goods sold and levels of investment in various assets. The important turnover ratios are debtors turnover ratio, average collection period, inventory/stock turnover ratio, fixed assets turnover ratio, and total assets turnover ratio. These are described below:

19

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO (DTO) Meaning: DTO is calculated by dividing the net credit sales by average debtors outstanding during the year. It measures the liquidity of a firm's debts. Net credit sales are the gross credit sales minus returns, if any, from customers. Average debtors are the average of debtors at the beginning and at the end of the year. This ratio shows how rapidly debts are collected. The higher the DTO, the better it is for the organization. Formula: Credit sales Debtors turnover ratio = Average debtors

20

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com INVENTORY OR STOCK TURNOVER RATIO (ITR) Meaning: ITR refers to the number of times the inventory is sold and replaced during the accounting period. Formula: COGS Stock Turnover Ratio = Average stock ITR reflects the efficiency of inventory management. The higher the ratio, the more efficient is the management of inventories, and vice versa. However, a high inventory turnover may also result from a low level of inventory, which may lead to frequent stock outs and loss of sales and customer goodwill. For calculating ITR, the average of inventories at the beginning and the end of the year is taken. In general, averages may be used when a flow figure (in this case, cost of goods sold) is related to a stock figure (inventories). FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER (FAT) The FAT ratio measures the net sales per rupee of investment in fixed assets. Formula: Net sales Fixed assets turnover = Net fixed assets This ratio measures the efficiency with which fixed assets are employed. A high ratio indicates a high degree of efficiency in asset utilization while a low ratio reflects an inefficient use of assets. However, this ratio should be used with caution because when the fixed assets of a firm are old and substantially depreciated, the fixed assets turnover ratio tends to be high (because the denominator of the ratio is very low).

21

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com PROPRIETORS RATIO: Meaning: Proprietary ratio is a test of financial & credit strength of the business. It relates shareholders fund to total assets. This ratio determines the long term or ultimate solvency of the company. In other words, Proprietary ratio determines as to what extent the owner’s interest & expectations are fulfilled from the total investment made in the business operation. Proprietary ratio compares the proprietor fund with total liabilities. It is usually expressed in the form of percentage. Total assets also know it as net worth. Formula: Proprietary fund Proprietary ratio = Total fund OR

Shareholders fund Proprietary ratio = Fixed assets + current liabilities STOCK WORKING CAPITAL RATIO: Meaning: This ratio shows the relationship between the closing stock & the working capital. It helps to judge the quantum of inventories in relation to the working capital of the business. The purpose of this ratio is to show the extent to which working capital is blocked in inventories. The ratio highlights the predominance of stocks in the current financial position of the company. It is expressed as a percentage. Formula: Stock Stock working capital ratio = Working Capital

22

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

Stock working capital ratio is a liquidity ratio. It indicates the composition & quality of the working capital. This ratio also helps to study the solvency of a concern. It is a qualitative test of solvency. It shows the extent of funds blocked in stock. If investment in stock is higher it means that the amount of liquid assets is lower. DEBT EQUITY RATIO: MEANING: This ratio compares the long-term debts with shareholders fund. The relationship between borrowed funds & owners capital is a popular measure of the long term financial solvency of a firm. This relationship is shown by debt equity ratio. Alternatively, this ratio indicates the relative proportion of debt & equity in financing the assets of the firm. It is usually expressed as a pure ratio. E.g. 2:1 Formula: Total long-term debt Debt equity ratio = Total shareholders fund Debt equity ratio is also called as leverage ratio. Leverage means the process of the increasing the equity shareholders return through the use of debt. Leverage is also known as ‘gearing’ or ‘trading on equity’. Debt equity ratio shows the margin of safety for long-term creditors & the balance between debt & equity. RETURN ON PROPRIETOR FUND: Meaning: Return on proprietors fund is also known as ‘return on proprietors equity’ or ‘return on shareholders investment’ or ‘ investment ratio’. This ratio indicates

23

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com the relationship between net profit earned & total proprietors funds. Return on proprietors fund is a profitability ratio, which the relationship between profit & investment by the proprietors in the concern. Its purpose is to measure the rate of return on the total fund made available by the owners. This ratio helps to judge how efficient the concern is in managing the owner’s fund at disposal. This ratio is of practical importance to prospective investors & shareholders. Formula: NPAT Return on proprietors fund = Proprietors fund * 100

CREDITORS TURNOVER RATIO: It is same as debtors turnover ratio. It shows the speed at which payments are made to the supplier for purchase made from them. It is a relation between net credit purchase and average creditors Net credit purchase Credit turnover ratio = Average creditors

Months in a year Average age of accounts payable = Credit turnover ratio

Both the ratios indicate promptness in payment of creditor purchases. Higher creditors turnover ratio or a lower credit period enjoyed signifies that the creditors are being paid promptly. It enhances credit worthiness of the company. A very low ratio indicates that the company is not taking full benefit of the credit period allowed by the creditors.

24

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

IMPORTANCE OF RATIO ANALYSIS:
As a tool of financial management, ratios are of crucial significance. The importance of ratio analysis lies in the fact that it presents facts on a comparative basis & enables the drawing of interference regarding the performance of a firm. Ratio analysis is relevant in assessing the performance of a firm in respect of the following aspects: 1] Liquidity position, 2] Long-term solvency, 3] Operating efficiency, 4] Overall profitability, 5] Inter firm comparison 6] Trend analysis. 1] LIQUIDITY POSITION: With the help of Ratio analysis conclusion can be drawn regarding the liquidity position of a firm. The liquidity position of a firm would be satisfactory if it is able to meet its current obligation when they become due. A firm can be said to have the ability to meet its short-term liabilities if it has sufficient liquid funds to pay the interest on its short maturing debt usually within a year as well as to repay the principal. This ability is reflected in the liquidity ratio of a firm. The liquidity ratio are particularly useful in credit analysis by bank & other suppliers of short term loans.

2] LONG TERM SOLVENCY: Ratio analysis is equally useful for assessing the long-term financial viability of a firm. This respect of the financial position of a borrower is of concern to the long-term creditors, security analyst & the present & potential owners of a business. The long-term solvency is measured by the leverage/ capital structure & profitability ratio Ratio analysis s that focus on earning power & operating efficiency.

25

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com Ratio analysis reveals the strength & weaknesses of a firm in this respect. The leverage ratios, for instance, will indicate whether a firm has a reasonable proportion of various sources of finance or if it is heavily loaded with debt in which case its solvency is exposed to serious strain. Similarly the various profitability ratios would reveal whether or not the firm is able to offer adequate return to its owners consistent with the risk involved. 3] OPERATING EFFICIENCY: Yet another dimension of the useful of the ratio analysis, relevant from the viewpoint of management, is that it throws light on the degree of efficiency in management & utilization of its assets. The various activity ratios measures this kind of operational efficiency. In fact, the solvency of a firm is, in the ultimate analysis, dependent upon the sales revenues generated by the use of its assets- total as well as its components. 4] OVERALL PROFITABILITY: Unlike the outsides parties, which are interested in one aspect of the financial position of a firm, the management is constantly concerned about overall profitability of the enterprise. That is, they are concerned about the ability of the firm to meets its short term as well as long term obligations to its creditors, to ensure a reasonable return to its owners & secure optimum utilization of the assets of the firm. This is possible if an integrated view is taken & all the ratios are considered together. 5] INTER – FIRM COMPARISON: Ratio analysis not only throws light on the financial position of firm but also serves as a stepping-stone to remedial measures. This is made possible due to inter firm comparison & comparison with the industry averages. A single figure of a particular ratio is meaningless unless it is related to some standard or norm. one of the popular techniques is to compare the ratios of a firm with

26

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com the industry average. It should be reasonably expected that the performance of a firm should be in broad conformity with that of the industry to which it belongs. An inter firm comparison would demonstrate the firms position vice-versa its competitors. If the results are at variance either with the industry average or with the those of the competitors, the firm can seek to identify the probable reasons & in light, take remedial measures. 6] TREND ANALYSIS: Finally, ratio analysis enables a firm to take the time dimension into account. In other words, whether the financial position of a firm is improving or deteriorating over the years. This is made possible by the use of trend analysis. The significance of the trend analysis of ratio lies in the fact that the analysts can know the direction of movement, that is, whether the movement is favorable or unfavorable. For example, the ratio may be low as compared to the norm but the trend may be upward. On the other hand, though the present level may be satisfactory but the trend may be a declining one.

ADVANTAGES OF RATIO ANALYSIS
Financial ratios are essentially concerned with the identification of significant accounting data relationships, which give the decision-maker insights into the financial performance of a company. The advantages of ratio analysis can be summarized as follows:  Ratios facilitate conducting trend analysis, which is important for decision making and forecasting.  Ratio analysis helps in the assessment of the liquidity, operating efficiency, profitability and solvency of a firm.  Ratio analysis provides a basis for both intra-firm as well as inter-firm comparisons.

27

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com  The comparison of actual ratios with base year ratios or standard ratios helps the management analyze the financial performance of the firm.

LIMITATIONS OF RATIO ANALYSIS
Ratio analysis has its limitations. These limitations are described below: 1] Information problems  Ratios require quantitative information for analysis but it is not decisive about analytical output .  The figures in a set of accounts are likely to be at least several months out of date, and so might not give a proper indication of the company’s current financial position.  Where historical cost convention is used, asset valuations in the balance sheet could be misleading. Ratios based on this information will not be very useful for decision-making. 2] Comparison of performance over time  When comparing performance over time, there is need to consider the changes in price. The movement in performance should be in line with the changes in price.  When comparing performance over time, there is need to consider the changes in technology. The movement in performance should be in line with the changes in technology.  Changes in accounting policy may affect the comparison of results between different accounting years as misleading.

28

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com 3] Inter-firm comparison  Companies may have different capital structures and to make comparison of performance when one is all equity financed and another is a geared company it may not be a good analysis.  Selective application of government incentives to various companies may also distort intercompany comparison. comparing the performance of two enterprises may be misleading.  Inter-firm comparison may not be useful unless the firms compared are of the same size and age, and employ similar production methods and accounting practices.  Even within a company, comparisons can be distorted by changes in the price level.  Ratios provide only quantitative information, not qualitative information.  Ratios are calculated on the basis of past financial statements. They do not indicate future trends and they do not consider economic conditions.

PURPOSE OF RATIO ANLYSIS: 1] To identify aspects of a businesses performance to aid decision making 2] Quantitative process – may need to be supplemented by qualitative Factors to get a complete picture. 3] 5 main areas: Liquidity – the ability of the firm to pay its way  Investment/shareholders – information to enable decisions to be made on the extent of the risk and the earning potential of a business investment  Gearing – information on the relationship between the exposure of the business to loans as opposed to share capital

29

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com  Profitability – how effective the firm is at generating profits given sales and or its capital assets  Financial – the rate at which the company sells its stock and the efficiency with which it uses its assets

ROLE OF RATIO ANALYSIS:
It is true that the technique of ratio analysis is not a creative technique in the sense that it uses the same figure & information, which is already appearing in the financial statement. At the same time, it is true that what can be achieved by the technique of ratio analysis cannot be achieved by the mere preparation of financial statement. Ratio analysis helps to appraise the firm in terms of their profitability & efficiency of performance, either individually or in relation to those of other firms in the same industry. The process of this appraisal is not complete until the ratio so computed can be compared with something, as the ratio all by them do not mean anything. This comparison may be in the form of intra firm comparison, inter firm comparison or comparison with standard ratios. Thus proper comparison of ratios may reveal where a firm is placed as compared with earlier period or in comparison with the other firms in the same industry. Ratio analysis is one of the best possible techniques available to the management to impart the basic functions like planning & control. As the future is closely related to the immediate past, ratio calculated on the basis of historical financial statements may be of good assistance to predict the future. Ratio analysis also helps to locate & point out the various areas, which need the management attention in order to improve the situation. As the ratio analysis is concerned with all the aspect of a firms financial analysis i.e. liquidity, solvency, activity, profitability & overall performance, it enables the interested persons to know the financial & operational characteristics of an organisation & take the suitable decision.

30

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

EVALUATION OF APLAB LIMITED THROUGH RATIO

COMPANY PROFILE THE COMPANY – APLAB Limited is a professionally managed Public Limited company quoted on the Bombay Stock Exchange. Since its inception in 1962, APLAB has been serving the global market with wide range of electronic products meeting the international standards for safety and reliability such as UL, VDE etc. They specialize in Test and Measurement Equipment, Power Conversion and UPS Systems, Self-Service Terminals for Banking Sector and Fuel Dispensers for Petroleum Sector. APLAB enjoys worldwide recognition for the quality of its products, business integrity and innovative engineering skills.

31

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

ABOUT APLAB:  Aplab started its operation in October 1962.  It is a professionally managed 40 years old public limited company.  It is quoted on BOMBAY STOCK EXCHANGE.  It serves customer global customer par excellence.  It specialized in Test & measurement instruments, power conversion, & UPS & fuel dispensers for petroleum sector.  It enjoys worldwide recognition for the quality of its business integrity & innovative engineering skills. MISSION:  To deliver high quality, carefully, engineered products, on time, with in budget, as per the customer specification in a manner profitable to both, our customers & so to us. VISION:  To be a global player, recognized for quality & integrity.  To be the TOP INDIAN COMPANY as conceived by our customers.  To be “ THE BEST ” company to work for, as rated by our employees. GOAL: 32

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com  Goal at Aplab is extract ordinary customer service as we provide our customer needs in the personal service industry. CORPORATE MISSION – 1] To achieve healthy and profitable growth of the company in the interest of our customers & the shareholders. 2] To encourage teamwork, reward innovation and maintain healthy interpersonal relations within the organization. 3] To expand knowledge and remain at the leading edge in technology to serve the global market. 4] To understand the customer’s needs and provide solutions than merely selling products. 5] To create intellectual capital by investing in hardware and embedded software development. VALUES & BELIEFS: Their values & beliefs required that they  Treat employees with respect & give them an opportunity for input on how to continuously improve their service goals.  Offer opportunities for growth, professional development & recognition.  Provide most effective & corrective action, to resolve customer service issues, to ensure customer satisfaction.  Foster an open door policy, which encourages interaction, discussion & ideas to improve work environment & increase productivity.  “ Do it right the first time & every time” is their team commitment * our way of doing business, it ensures as growth & prosperity.

33

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com THE 21ST CENTURY SUCCESS – APLAB had planned to enter the 21st Century with a program for a fast and healthy growth in the global market based on company’s high technology foundation and the reputation of four decades for prompt customer service and as a reliable solution provider. After completing three years in the new era, we can say with pride that we have been delivering our promises to our customers and the shareholders. APLAB has entered the field of Professional Services starting with the Banking and the Petroleum Industry. Focus on developing embedded system software has been also enhanced. We believe that professional services sector is poised to grow at a very rapid pace. QUALITY IS OUR WORK CULTURE - ISO 9001:2000 Quality at APLAB is a part of our people’s attitude. Entire organization is committed to create an environment that encourages individual excellence and a personal commitment to quality. In APLAB, “Quality is everybody’s responsibility” and all strive to “do it right the first time”. It is therefore natural that APLAB Limited is certified for quality with ISO 9001:2000 registration. QUALITY POLICY:  Aplab will deliver to its customer products & services that consistently meet or exceed their requirement.  Aplab will achieve this by total commitment & involvement of every individual.  Aplab will encourage its employees & suppliers to develop quality products prevent defects & make continual improvement in all processes. QUALITY OBJECTIVE:

34

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com  Aplab is an ISO 9001:2000 certifies company.  100% customer satisfaction.  On time delivery every time reduction is out going PPM to 10,000 [4 sigma]

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Developing innovative products with the latest technology is the core strength of APLAB. The Science & Technology Ministry of the Govt. of India accredits our R&D Laboratories. We have a large team of dedicated, highly qualified skilled engineers who excel in the latest state-of-the-art-technology. APLAB is recognized not only for manufacturing standard products but also in providing solutions and services as per the customer specifications. We spend more than 4% of the company revenue in Research & Development activities. Specific areas in which the company carries out R&D 1. Development of new product especially hi-tech intelligent product & electronic substitution. 3. Development of products to suit exports markets. 4. Customizing the products to the customer’s specifications & adaptation of imported technology. The company has achieved its position of leadership in the Indian instrumentation industry & continuous to maintain it through its strong grip of technology. Almost all the products manufactured by the company are import transaction control system. 2. Improvement in the existing products & production processes, import

35

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com substitution items, which are fully developed in house. It has resulted in considerable saving of foreign exchange. With the company, R&D is an ongoing process. The ministry of science & technology, Government of India, recognizes the company’s R&D. Through a continuous interaction with production& Quality Assurance Department takes up redesign of existing products. This is done to achieve state of the art in our design & to bring about improvement to get maximum performance / cost ratio. FUTURE PLAN OF ACTION Major R&D activity is concentrated around up gradation of product design & re-alignment of production processes to bring about improved quality at lower cost. This will greatly help the company in facing competition in local markets from foreign companies. EXPORT APLAB currently exports over 25% of its production to Western Europe, Canada & USA. Over 30 million U.S. Dollars worth of Power Systems and Test Instruments from APLAB are today operational in UK, Germany, France, Sweden, Belgium, Canada, and USA & Australia.

36

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

APLAB’S ORGANISATION CHART EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN

MANAGING DIRECTOR DIRECTOR [TECHNICAL - PE] GENERAL MANAGER MAEKETING DIRECTOR REGIOAL HEAD: MUMBAI NEWDELHI SECUNDARABAD BANGLORE CHENNAI

FINANCE MANAGER

G.M PROD. &

G.M. MARKETING

MATERIAL MANAGER

G.M. ELTRAC PROD.

G.M. DESIGN & DESIGN

DEVLOPMENT 37

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

OFFICERS STAFF WORKERS

PRODUCTS OF APLAB: a. TEST & MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS b. HIGH POWER AC SYSTEMS (UPS, Frequency Converter, Inverter, Isolation Transformer) c. HIGH POWER DC SYSTEMS (DC Power Supply, DC Uninterruptible Power Supply) d. ATM INSTACASH e. POWER SUPPLIES, AC-DC POWER SUPPLY, STABILIZER, DC/DC LINE CONVERTERS, SMPS, INVERTERS,

CONDITIONER, ISOLATION TRANSFORMER ATM INSTACASH The Banking Automation Division of APLAB was launched in 1993, when we introduced INSTACASHIndia’s first indigenously manufactured ATM INSTACASH demonstrated APLAB’s skills in design, hardware manufacturing and software integrations. 38

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com Our in house R&D group is constantly striving to scan the rapidly changing technology and offer suitable end to end solutions. We are into Self Service Delivery Systems, MICR Cheque Processing and Smart Card based solutions. The latest is IMAGEENABLED Cheque Processing solution- QUICKCLEAR.

APLAB LIMITED
BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31ST MARCH 2002 (RS.’000) AS AT 31ST 2002 AS AT 31ST 2002 SOURCES OF FUNDS SHAREHOLDERS FUND Share capital Reserves and surplus LOANS Secured Unsecured DEFFERED TAX LIABILITY (NET) TOTAL APPLICATION OF FUNDS FIXED ASSETS Gross block Less: depreciation Net block Capital work in progress INVESTMENT CURRENT ASSESTS, LOANS & ADVANCES Inventories Sundary debtors Cash & bank balances Loan & advances CURRENT LIABLITIES & PROVISIONS Current liabilities

5,00,00 16,29,69 21,29,69 12,13,48 3,67,99 15,81,47 1,06,85 38,18,01

15,90,33 10,32,96 5,57,37 54,36 6,11,73 1,22,32

19,09,77 18,49,35 3,31,32 5,80,36 46,70,80

15,36,09

39

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com Provisions NET CURRENT ASSESTS MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURE Total 57,57 15,93,66 30,77,14 6,84 3818,01

PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT FOR THE ENDED 31ST MARCH 2002 (RS.’000) AS AT 31-3- 2002 AS AT 31-3-2002 INCOME: Sales and operating earnings Other income Variation in stock EXPENCES: Materials consumed Purchase of trading goods Payments to & provision for employees Manufacturing expenses Excise duty Other expenses Interest & finance charges Depreciation Less: transferred to revaluation PROFIT BEFORE TAX PRIOR YEAR ADJUSTMENT (NET) PROVISION FOR TAXATION Current tax Deferred tax liability / (Assets) PROFIT AFTER TAX Balance brought forward from previous year Balance available for appropriation Appropriations: General reserve Surplus / (loss) carried to B/S Proposed dividend Tax on proposed dividend 40 48,19,19 80,50 1,31,07 50,30,76 18,97,28 8,61,75 9,95,04 2,21,37 65,05 5,76,71 2,60,22 1,05,37 1,15 1,04,22 49,81,64 49,12

24,42 4,02 20,68 1 20,69

20,68 1

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com 20,69 Basic earning per share (rupee) 0.41 0.41

BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31ST MARCH 2003 (RS.’000) AS AT 31-3- 2003 AS AT 31-3- 2003 SOURCES OF FUNDS SHAREHOLDERS FUND Share capital Reserves and surplus LOANS Secured Unsecured DEFFERED TAX LIABILITY (NET) TOTAL APPLICATION OF FUNDS FIXED ASSETS Gross block Less: depreciation Net block Capital work in progress INVESTMENT CURRENT ASSESTS, LOANS & ADVANCES Inventories Sundary debtors Cash & bank balances Loan & advances CURRENT LIABLITIES & PROVISIONS Current liabilities Provisions

5,00,00 16,55,19 21,55,19 10,27,55 4,53,16 14,80,71 87,21 37,23,11

17,40,97 11,40,93 6,00,04 29,74 6,29,78 1,47,26

19,02,79 19,05,76 3,95,25 8,98,62 51,02,42

20,41,56 1,20,76 21,62,32 41

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com NET CURRENT ASSESTS MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURE TOTAL 29,40,10 5,97 37,23,11

PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT FOR THE ENDED 31ST MARCH 2003 (RS.’000) AS AT 31-3- 2003 AS AT 31-3- 2003 INCOME: Sales and operating earnings Other income Variation in stock EXPENCES: Materials consumed Purchase of trading goods Payments to & provision for Employees Manufacturing expenses Excise duty Other expenses Interest & finance charges Depreciation Less: transferred to revaluation PROFIT BEFORE TAX PRIOR YEAR ADJUSTMENT (NET) PROVISION FOR TAXATION Current tax Deferred tax liability / (Assets) PROFIT AFTER TAX Balance brought forward from previous year Balance available for appropriation Appropriations: General reserve Surplus / (loss) carried to B/S Proposed dividend Tax on proposed dividend Basic earning per share (rupee) 42 59,62,22 15,04 (59,27) 59,17,99 22,41,60 10,37,52 10,63,96 2,69,99 72,69 7,62,23 2,36,57 1,07,97 1,03 1,06,94 57,91,50 1,26,49

63,19 (19,64) 82,94 1 82,95

26,50 4 50,00 6,41 82,95 1.66

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31ST MARCH 2004 (RS.’000) AS AT 31-3- 2004 AS AT 31-3- 2004 SOURCES OF FUNDS SHAREHOLDERS FUND Share capital Reserves and surplus LOANS Secured Unsecured DEFFERED TAX LIABILITY (NET) TOTAL APPLICATION OF FUNDS FIXED ASSETS Gross block Less: depreciation Net block Capital work in progress INVESTMENT CURRENT ASSESTS, LOANS & ADVANCES Inventories Sundary debtors Cash & bank balances Loan & advances CURRENT LIABLITIES & PROVISIONS Current liabilities Provisions NET CURRENT ASSESTS TOTAL

5,00,00 17,42,59 22,42,59 11,38,86 5,58,29 16,97.15 95,33 40,35,07

18,41,58 12,40,03 6,01,55 15,29 6,16,84 1,48,34

21,46,20 19,51,56 4,49,74 850,58 53,98,08

18,16,17 3,12,02 21,28,19 32,69,89 40,35,07

43

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT FOR THE ENDED 31ST MARCH 2004 (RS.’000) AS AT 31-3- 2004 AS AT 31-3-2004 INCOME: Sales and operating earnings Other income Variation in stock EXPENCES: Materials consumed Purchase of trading goods Payments to & provision for employees Manufacturing expenses Excise duty Other expenses Interest & finance charges Depreciation Less: transferred to revaluation PROFIT BEFORE TAX PRIOR YEAR ADJUSTMENT (NET) PROVISION FOR TAXATION Current tax Deferred tax liability / (Assets) PROFIT AFTER TAX Balance brought forward from previous year Balance available for appropriation Appropriations: General reserve Surplus / (loss) carried to B/S Proposed dividend Tax on proposed divident Basic earning per share (rupee) 73,90,47 31,39 53,99 74,75,85 28,51,40 14,03,33 12,94,47 3,07,51 70,08 9,17,94 2,46,30 1,10,89 93 1,09,96 72,00,99 2,74,86 25,71 1,19,50 8,13 17294 4 1,72,98

88,30 7 75,00 9,61 1,72,98 3.46

44

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31ST MARCH 2005 (RS.’000) AS AT 31-3- 2005 AS AT 31-3- 2005 SOURCES OF FUNDS SHAREHOLDERS FUND Share capital Reserves and surplus LOANS Secured Unsecured DEFFERED TAX LIABILITY (NET) TOTAL APPLICATION OF FUNDS FIXED ASSETS Gross block Less: depreciation Net block Capital work in progress INVESTMENT CURRENT ASSESTS, LOANS & ADVANCES Inventories Sundary debtors Cash & bank balances Loan & advances CURRENT LIABLITIES & PROVISIONS Current liabilities Provisions NET CURRENT ASSESTS TOTAL

5,00,00 19,14,91 24,14,91 17,23,12 5,36,89 22,60,01 92,02 47,66,94

21,64,89 13,43,05 8,21,84 8,21,84 2,32,91

19,32,88 23,06,67 6,04,64 10,04,02 58,48,21

16,55,15 4,80,87 21,36,02 37,12,19 47,66,19

PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT FOR THE ENDED 31ST MARCH 2005

45

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com (RS.’000) AS AT 31-3- 2005 AS AT 31-3 2005 INCOME: Sales and operating earnings Other income Variation in stock EXPENCES: Materials consumed Purchase of trading goods Payments to & provision for employees Manufacturing expenses Excise duty Other expenses Interest & finance charges Depreciation Less: transferred to revaluation PROFIT BEFORE TAX PRIOR YEAR ADJUSTMENT (NET) PROVISION FOR TAXATION Current tax Deferred tax liability / (Assets) PROFIT AFTER TAX Balance brought forward from previous year Balance available for appropriation Appropriations: General reserve Surplus / (loss) carried to B/S Proposed dividend Basic earning per share (rupee) 74,20,31 41,69 (38,45) 74,23,55 25,91,83 15,21,00 13,54,15 2,71,41 75,41 8,44,78 2,15,82 1,26,68 84 1,25,84 70,00,24 4,23,31

1,50,84 (3,31) 2,75,78 7 2,75,85

1,73,20 3 90,00 2,75,85 5.52

CALCULATIONS AND INTERPRETATION OF RATIO’S 1] CURRENT RATIO:
46

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com Formula: Current assets Current ratio = Current liabilities YEAR Current assets Current liabilities Current ratio COMMENTS: In Aplab company the current ratio is 2.72:1 in 2004-2005. it means that for one rupee of current liabilities, the current assets are 2.72 rupee are available to the them. In other words the current assets are 2.72 times the current liabilities. Almost 4 years current ratio is same but current ratio in 2004-2005 is bit higher, which makes company more sound. The consistency increase in the value of current assets will increase the ability of the company to meets its obligations & therefore from the point of view of creditors the company is less risky. The available working capital with the company is in increasing order. 2001-2002 - 30,77,14 2002-2003 - 29,46,07 2003-2004 - 32,69,89 2004-2005 - 36,92,19 The company has sufficient working capital to meets its urgency/ obligations. A company has a high percentage of its current assets in the form of working capital, cash that would be more liquid in the sense of being able to meet obligations as & when they become due. From this working capital, the company meets its day-to-day financial obligations. Thus, the current ratio throws light on the company’s ability to pay its current liabilities out of its current assets. The Aplab Company’s has a very good liquidity position of company. 2001-2002 46,70,80 15,93,66 2.93 2002-2003 51,08,39 21,62,32 2.36 2003-2004 53,98,08 21,28,19 2.53 2004 -2005 58,28,21 21,36,02 2.72

47

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

2] LIQUID RATIO:
Formula: Quick assets Liquid ratio = Quick liabilities YEAR Quick assets Quick liabilities Liquid ratio COMMENTS: The liquid or quick ratio indicates the liquid financial position of an enterprise. Almost in all 4 years the liquid ratio is same, which is better for the company to meet the urgency. The liquid ratio of the Aplab Company has increased from 1.12 to 1.36 in 2004-2005. Day to day solvency is more sound for company in 2004-2005 over the year 2003-2004. This indicates that the dependence on the short-term liabilities & creditors are less & the company is following a conservative working capital policy. Liquid ratio of Company is favorable because the quick assets of the company are more than the quick liabilities. The liquid ratio shows the company’s ability to meet its immediate obligations promptly. 2001-2002 21,80,67 15,93,66 1.36 2002-2003 23,01,01 21,62,32 1.06 2003-2004 24,01,30 21,28,19 1.12 2004 -2005 29,11,31 21,36,02 1.36

3] PROPRIETORY RATIO:
Formula: Proprietary fund Proprietary ratio = Total fund Shareholders fund Proprietary ratio = Fixed assets + current liabilities OR

48

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

YEAR Proprietary fund Total fund Proprietary ratio COMMENTS:

2001-2002 21,29,69 52,82,53 40

2002-2003 21,55,19 57,38,17 37.55

2003-2004 22,42,59 66,14,92 33.90

2004 -2005 24,14,91 66,70,05 36.20

The Proprietary ratio of the company is 36.20% in the year 2004-2005. It means that the for every one rupee of total assets contribution of 36 paise has come from owners fund & remaining balance 66 paise is contributed by the outside creditors. This shows that the contribution by outside to total assets is more than the owners fund. This Proprietary ratio of the Company shows a downward trend for the last 4 years. As the Proprietary ratio is not favorable the Company’s long-term solvency position is not sound.

4] STOCK WORKING CAPITAL RATIO:
Formula: Stock Stock working capital ratio = Working Capital YEAR Stock Working Capital Stock working capital ratio COMMENTS: This ratio shows that extend of funds blocked in stock. The amount of stock is increasing from the year 2001-2002 to 2003-2004. However in the year 2004-2005 it has declined to 52%. In the year 2004-2005 the sale is increased which affects decrease in stock that effected in increase in working capital in 2004-2005. It shows that the solvency position of the company is sound. 2001-2002 19,09,77 30,77,14 62.06 2002-2003 19,02,79 29,46,07 64.58 2003-2004 21,46,20 32,69,89 65.63 2004 -2005 19,32,88 37,12,19 52.06

49

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

5] CAPITAL GEARING RATIO:
Formula: Preference capital+ secured loan

Capital gearing ratio =
Equity capital & reserve & surplus

YEAR Secured loan Equity capital & reserves & surplus Capital gearing ratio COMMENTS:

2001-2002 12,13,48 21,29,69 56.97

2002-2003 10,27,56 21,55,19 47.67

2003-2004 11,38,86 22,42,59 50.78

2004 -2005 1,72,312 2,41,491 71

Gearing means the process of increasing the equity shareholders return through the use of debt. Capital gearing ratio is a leverage ratio, which indicates the proportion of debt & equity in the financing of assets of a company. For the last 3 years [i.e.2001-2002 TO 2003-2004] Capital gearing ratio is all most same which indicates, near about 50% of the fund covering the secured loan position. But in the year 2004-2005 the Capital-gearing ratio is 71%. It means that during the year 2004-2005 company has borrowed more secured loans for the company’s expansion.

6] DEBT EQUITY RATIO:
Formula: Total long term debt Debt equity ratio = Total shareholders fund YEAR Long term debt 2001-2002 15,81,47 2002-2003 14,80,70 21,55,19 2003-2004 16,97,15 22,42,59 2004 -2005 22,60,01 24,14,91

Shareholders 21,29,69

50

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com fund Debt Equity Ratio 0.74 COMMENTS: The debt equity ratio is important tool of financial analysis to appraise the financial structure of the company. It expresses the relation between the external equities & internal equities. This ratio is very important from the point of view of creditors & owners. The rate of debt equity ratio is increased from 0.74 to 0.93 during the year 2001-2002 to 2004-2005. This shows that with the increase in debt, the shareholders fund also increased. This shows long-term capital structure. The lower ratio viewed as favorable from long term creditors point of view.

0.68

0.75

0.93

7] GROSS PROFIT RATIO:
Formula: Gross profit Gross profit ratio = Net sales * 100

YEAR Gross profit Net sales Gross profit Ratio

2001-2002 24,54,48 43,45,46 56.48

2002-2003 37,65,90 51,02,37 73.80

2003-2004 45,57,45 68,76,89 66.27

2004 -2005 42,37,52 68,09,78 62.22

51

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

Gross profit Ratio 80 60 40 20 0 20012002 20022003 20032004 2004 2005 Gross profit Ratio

COMMENTS: The gross profit is the profit made on sale of goods. It is the profit on turnover. In the year 2001-2002 the gross profit ratio is 56.48%. It has increased to 73.80% in the year 2002-2003 due to increase in sales without corresponding increase in cost of goods sold. However the gross profit ratio decreased to 66.27% in the year 2003-2004. It is further declined to 62.22% in the year 2004-2005, due to high cost of purchases & overheads. Although the gross profit ratio is declined during the year 2002-2003 to 2004-2005. The net sales and gross profit is continuously increasing from the year 2001-2002 to 2004-2005.

8] OPERATING RATIO:
Formula: COGS+ operating expenses

Operating ratio =
Net sales YEAR COGS + Operating expenses Net sales Operating ratio 2001-2002 18,90,98 + 2,21,37 + 5,76,71 43,45,46 61.88% 2002-2003 21,96,32 + 2,69,98 + 7,62,23 51,02,37 63.27%

*100
2003-2004 28,33,02 + 3,07,51 + 9,17,94 68,76,89 59% 2004 -2005 2,57,226+ 27,141+ 84,478 6,80,978 54.16%

52

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com COMMENTS: The operating ratio shows the relationship between costs of activities & net sales. Operating ratio over a period of 4 years when compared that indicate the change in the operational efficiency of the company. The operating ratio of the company has decreased in all 4 year. This is due to increase in the cost of goods sold, which in 2001-2002 was 61.88%, in 2002-2003 was 63.27%, in 2003-2004 was 59% & in 2004-2005 it is 54.16%. though the cost has increased in 2002-2003 as compared to 2001-2002, it is reducing continuously over the next two years, indicate downward trend in cost but upward / positive trend in operational performance. 9] EXPENSE RATIO: The ratio of each item of expense or each group of expense to net sales is known as ‘Expense ratio’. The expense ratio brings out the relationship between various elements of operating cost & net sales. Expense ratio analyzes each individual item of expense or group of expense& expresses them as a percentage in relation to net sales. A] MANUFACTURING EXPENSES: Formula: Manufacturing expenses Manufacturing expense ratio = Net sales YEAR Manufacturing expenses Net sales Manufacturing expenses ratio 2001-2002 2,21,37 43,45,46 5% 2002-2003 2,69,98 51,02,37 5.29% 2003-2004 3,07,51 68,76,89 4.47% 2004 -2005 2,71,41 68,09,78 3.98% *100

53

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com COMMENTS: The manufacturing expense is shows the downward trend. During the year 2001–2002 to 2002-2003 the manufacturing expense increased because there is increase in the charges like labour, rent , power & electricity, repair to plant & machinery & miscellaneous works expenses. The manufacturing expense during the year 2001-2002 to 2004-2005 is decreased from 5% to 3.96%. This indicates that the company has control over the manufacturing expense. B] OTHER EXPENSES: Formula: Other expenses Other expense ratio = Net sales YEAR Other expenses Net sales Other expenses ratio 2001-2002 5,76,71 43,45,46 13.2% 2002-2003 7,62,23 51,02,37 14.93% 2003-2004 9,17,94 68,76,89 13.34% 2004 -2005 8,44,78 68,09,78 12.40% *100

COMMENTS: The other expense of company is increased during the 2001-2002 to 20032004, because increase in the charges of rent of office, equipment lease rental, printing & stationary, advertisement & publicity, transport outward & other charges. But during the year 2004-2005 the other expenses is decrease from 13.34% to 12.40%. Because decrease in equipment lease rental, advertisement & publicity, transport charges, commission & discount, sales tax & purchase tax . This indicates that the company also controlling the other expenses.

54

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

10) NET PROFIT RATIO
Formula: NPAT Net profit ratio = Net sales YEAR NPAT Net sales Net profit ratio 2001-2002 20,98 434546 0.48 2002-2003 82,94 51,02,37 1.6 2003-2004 1,72,94 68,76,89 2.5 2004 -2005 2,75,78 68,09,78 4.04 * 100

NET PROFIT
5 4 3 2 1 0 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005

COMMENTS: The net profit ratio of the company is low in all year but the net profit is increasing order from this ratio of 4 year it has been observe that the from 2001-2002 to 2004-2005 the net profit is increased i.e. in 2003 it is increased by 1.12 in 2003-2004 by 0.9 & in 2004-2005 by 1.54. Profitability ratio of company shows considerable increase. Company’s sales have increased in all 4 years & at the same time company has been successful in controlling the expenses i.e. manufacturing & other expenses. It is a clear index of cost control, managerial efficiency & sales promotion.

55

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

11] STOCK TURNOVER RATIO:
Formula: COGS Stock Turnover Ratio = Average stock YEAR COGS Average stock Stock Turnover Ratio COMMENTS: Stock turnover ratio shows the relationship between the sales & stock it means how stock is being turned over into sales. The stock turnover ratio is 2001-2002 was 3.4 times which indicate that the stock is being turned into sales 3.4 times during the year. The inventory cycle makes 3.4 round during the year. It helps to work out the stock holding period, it means the stock turnover ratio is 3.4 times then the stock holding period is 3.5 months [12/3.4=3.5months]. This indicates that it takes 3.5 months for stock to be sold out after it is produced. For the last 4 years stock turnover ratio is lower than the standard but it is in increasing order. In the year 2001-2002 to 2004-2005 the stock turnover ratio has improved from 3.4 to 3.73 times, it means with lower inventory the company has achieved greater sales. Thus, the stock of the company is moving fast in the market. 2001-2002 18,90,98 5,49,90 3.4 2002-2003 21,96,32 5,97,58 3.6 2003-2004 28,33,02 6,73,11 4.20 2004 -2005 25,72,26 6,89,30 3.73

12] RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED:
Formula: NPAT

Return on capital employed =
Capital employed

*100

56

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com YEAR NPAT Capital employed Return on capital employed COMMENTS: The return on capital employed shows the relationship between profit & investment. Its purpose is to measure the overall profitability from the total funds made available by the owner & lenders. The return on capital employed of Rs.5 indicate that net return of Rs.5 is earned on a capital employed of Rs.100. this amount of Rs.5 is available to take care of interest, tax,& appropriation. The return on capital employed is show-increasing trend, i.e. from 0.54 to 5.79. All of sudden in 2001-2002 the return on capital employed increased from 0.54 to 5.79. This indicates a very high profitability on each rupee of investment & has a great scope to attract large amount of fresh fund. 2001-2002 20,68 38,18,01 0.54 2002-2003 82,94 37,23,11 2.23 2003-2004 1,72,94 40,35,07 4.28 2004 -2005 2,75,78 47,66,93 5.79

13] EARNING PER SHARE:
Formula: NPAT

Earning per share =
Number of equity share YEAR NPAT No.ofequity share Earning per share COMMENTS: Earning per share is calculated to find out overall profitability of the company. Earning per share represents the earning of the company whether or not dividends are declared. The Earning per share is 5.52 means shareholder gets Rs. 5.52 for each share of Rs. 10/-. In other words the shareholder earned Rs. 5.52 per share. 2001-2002 20,98,000 50,00,000 0.41 2002-2003 82,94,000 50,00,000 1.66 2003-2004 1,72,94,000 50,00,000 3.46 2004 -2005 2,75,78,000 50,00,000 5.52

57

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com The net profit after tax of the company is increasing in all years. Therefore the shareholders earning per share is increased continuously from 2001-2002 to 2004-2005 by 0.41 to 05.52. This shows it is continuous capital appreciation per unit share by 0.41 to 05.52.

The above diagram shows the Earning per share and Dividend per share is increasing rapidly. It is beneficial to the shareholders and prospective investor to invest the money in this company.

14] DIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO:
Formula: Dividend per share

Dividend Pay out ratio =
Earning per share YEAR Dividend per share Earning per share Dividend payout ratio 2001-2002 0.41 2002-2003 1 1.66 60.24

* 100
2003-2004 1.50 3.46 43.35 2004 -2005 1.80 5.52 32.60

58

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com COMMENTS: In the year 2002-2003 and 2003-2004 the Dividend pay out ratio is 60.24 and 43.35 respectively. In the year 2002-2003 the company has declared the dividend 60.24 and the balance 39.76 is retained with them for the expansion. The company has not earned more profit in the year 2001-2002 hence the company has not declared dividend in the year 2001-2002. However the company has declared more dividends in the year 2002-2003 as the company has sufficient profit. In the year 2004 the company has declared 1.50 dividends per share hence the earning per share has doubled. From this one can say that the company is more conservative for expansion.

15] COST OF GOODS SOLD:
Formula: COGS Cost of goods sold Ratio = Net sales YEAR COGS Net sales Cost of goods sold ratio COMMENTS: This ratio shows the rate of consumption of raw material in the process of production. In the year 2001-2002 the cost of goods sold ratio is 43.51% so the gross profit is 56.49%. it indicates that in 2001-2002, the 43% of raw material is consumed in the process of production. During the last 4 years the rate of cost of goods sold ratio is continuously decreasing however the gross profit & sales is increased during the same period. 2001-2002 18,90,98 43,45,46 43.51 2002-2003 21,96,32 51,02,37 43.04 2003-2004 28,33,02 68,76,89 41.19 2004 -2005 25,72,26 68,09,78 37.77 * 100

59

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

16] CASH RATIO:
Formula: Cash + Bank + Marketable securities Cash ratio = Total current liabilities YEAR Cash + Bank + Marketable securities Total current liabilities Cash ratio COMMENTS: This ratio is called as super quick ratio or absolute liquidity ratio. In the year 2001-2002 the cash ratio is 0.20 & then it is decreased to 0.18 in the year 2002-2003. Then again it is increased to 0.21 in the year 2003-2004 & 0.28 in the year 2004-2005. This shows that the company has sufficient cash, bank balance, & marketable securities to meet any contingency. 2001-2002 3,31,32 15,93,66 0.20 2002-2003 3,95,25 21,62,32 0.18 2003-2004 4,49,74 21,28,19 0.21 2004 -2005 6,04,64 21,36,02 0.28

17] RETURN ON PROPRIETORS FUND:
Formula: NPAT Return on proprietors fund = Proprietors fund YEAR NPAT Proprietors fund Return on proprietors fund 2001-2002 20,68 21,29,69 0.97 2002-2003 82,94 21,55,19 3.84 2003-2004 1,72,94 22,42,59 7.71 2004 -2005 2,75,78 24,14,91 11.41 * 100

60

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com COMMENTS: Return on proprietors fund shows the relationship between profits & investments by proprietors in the company. In the year 2002-2003 the return on proprietors fund is 3.84% it means the net return of Rs. 3 approximately is earned on the each Rs. 100 of funds contributed by the owners. During the last 4 years the rate of return on proprietors fund is in increasing order. The return on proprietors fund during the year 2001-2002 to 2004-2005 is increased from 0.97% to 11.41%. It shows that the company has a very large returns available to take care of high dividends, large transfers to reserve etc. & has a great scope to attract large amount of fresh fund from owners.

18] RETURN ON EQUITY:
Formula: NPAT Return on equity share capital = No. of equity share YEAR NPAT No. of equity share Return on equity share capital COMMENTS: This ratio shows the relationship between profit & equity shareholders fund in the company. It is used by the present / prospective investor for deciding whether to purchase, keep or sell the equity shares. In the year 2002-2003 the return on proprietors fund is 16.5%, which means the net return of Rs. 16, is earned on the each Rs.100 of the funds contributed by the equity shareholders. The rate of return on equity share capital is increased from4.13% to 55% during the year 2001-2002 to 2004-2005. This shows that the company has a very large returns available to take care of high equity dividend, large transfers 61 2001-2002 20,68 50,000 4.13 2002-2003 82,94 50,000 16.5 2003-2004 1,72,94 50,000 34.58 2004 -2005 2,75,78 50,000 55 * 100

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com to reserve, & also company has a great scope to attract large amount to fresh funds by issue of equity share & also company has a very good price for equity shares in the BSE.

19] OPERATING PROFIT RATIO:
Formula: Operating profit Operating profit ratio = Net sales COMMENTS: Operating profit ratio shows the relationship between operating profit & the sales. The operating profit is equal to gross profit minus all operating expenses or sales less cost of goods sold and operating expenses. The operating profit ratio of 7.11% indicates that average operating margin of Rs.7 is earned on sale of Rs. 100. this amount of Rs. 7 is available for meeting non operating expenses. In the other words operating profit ratio 7.11% means that 7.11% of net sales remains as operating profit after meeting all operating expenses. During the last 4 years the operating profit ratio is increased from 7.11% to 9.38%. It indicates that the company has great efficiency in managing all its operations of production, purchase, inventory, selling and distribution and also has control over the direct and indirect costs. Thus, company has a large margin is available to meet non-operating expenses and earn net profit. *100

20] CREDITORS TURNOVER RATIO:
Formula: Net credit purchase Credit turnover ratio = Average creditors

62

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

Months in a year Average age of accounts payable = Credit turnover ratio YEAR Net credit purchase Average creditors Credit turnover ratio Average age of accounts payable COMMENTS: The creditors turnover ratio shows the relationship between the credit purchase and average trade creditors. It shows the speed with which the payments are made to the suppliers for the purchase made from them. The credit turnover ratio of 4, indicate that the creditors are being turned over 4times during the year. It indicates the number of rounds taken by the credit cycle of payables during the year. There is no standard ratio in absolute term. The creditors ratio for the year 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 as good as the same, but it is increased by 3.6 to 4 in 2003-2004.this means the company has settled the creditors dues very fastly than the previous year. DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO: Formula: Credit sales Debtors turnover ratio = Average debtors Days in a year Debt collection period = Debtor’s turnover 2001-2002 21,21,43 5,88,42 3.6 times 3.3 months 2002-2003 22,71,80 7,91,21 3.6 times 3.3 months 2003-2004 29,08,61 6,96,86 4 times 3 months 2004 -2005 25,29,04 7,80,39 3 times 4 months

63

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com YEAR Credit sales Average debtors Debtors turnover ratio Debt collection period COMMENTS: Debtor’s turnover ratio is alternative known as “ Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio”. This ratio measures the collectibility of debtors & other accounts receivable, it means the rate at which the trade debts are being collected. The Debtors turnover ratio of 2.5 indicates that the debtors are being turned over 2.5 times during the year. It means that the credit cycle of debtors makes 2.5 rounds during the year. It helps to workout the debt collection period i.e. 146 days [365/ 2.5 = 146]. This indicates that it take146 days on an average for the debtors to be settled. Debt collection period indicates the duration of the credit cycle of the debtors. The Debtors turnover ratio is almost same during the year 2001-2002 to 2004-2005, which indicates that the debts are being collected at a fast speed during the year. The operating cycle of the debtors is short. In other words the debts collection period is short which result into less chance of bad debts. 2001-2002 47,77,48 18,49,35 2.5 times 146 days 2002-2003 55,21,33 19,05,76 2.8 times 130 days 2003-2004 74,87,36 19,51,56 3.8 times 96 days 2004 -2005 68,09,78 23,06,67 2.9 times 125 days

64

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL POSITION OF APLAB LIMITED
After going through the various ratios, I would like to state that: • • • • • • • The short-term solvency of the company is quite satisfactory. Immediate solvency position of the company is also quite satisfactory. The company can meet its urgent obligations immediately. Credit policies are effective. Over all profitability position of the company is quite satisfactory. Stock turnover rate is satisfactory. Stock of the company is moving fast in the market. The company is paying promptly to the suppliers. The return on capital employed is satisfactory.

The management should take care of inventory management and speed up the movement of stock. Effective selling technique or product modification may be adopted to face the competitors and to improve the financial position of the company by taking appropriate decisions.

65

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

CONCLUSION:
The focus of financial analysis is on key figures contained in the financial statements and the significant relationship that exits. The reliability and significance attach to the ratios will largely on hinge upon the quality of data on which they are best. They are as good for as bad as the data it self. Financial ratios are a useful by product of financial statement and provide standardized measures of firms financial position, profitability and riskiness. It is an important and powerful tool in the hands of financial analyst. By calculating one or other ratio or group of ratios he can analyze the performance of a firm from the different point of view. The ratio analysis can help in understanding the liquidity and short-term solvency of the firm, particularly for the trade creditors and banks. Long-term solvency position as measured by different debt ratios can help a debt investor or financial institutions to evaluate the degree of financial risk. The operational efficiency of the firm in utilizing its assets to generate profits can be assessed on the basis of different turnover ratios. The profitability of the firm can be analyzed with the help of profitability ratios. However the ratio analyses suffers from different limitations also. The ratios need not be taken for granted and accepted at face values. These ratios are numerous and there are wide spread variations in the same measure. Ratios generally do the work of diagnosing a problem only and failed to provide the solution to the problem.

66

Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com

BIBLIOGRAPHY
REFERENCE BOOKS –  FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Theory, Concepts & problems R.P.RUSTAGI FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Text and problems M.Y. KHAN AND P. K. JAIN MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING AINAPURE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT L.N. CHOPDE D.N. CHOUDHARI S.L. CHOPDE ANAUAL REPORTS OF APLAB LIMITED     2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005







WEBSIDES    www.bizd.ac.uk/compfact/ratio www.cecunc.org.com/business/financial www.zeromillion.com.business/financial

67